You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> on 2015/07/13 10:11:59 UTC

[Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

Hey

Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would
bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML.

I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications
about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds.

I am suggest to make a seprate ML for those who really want it.

Any thoughts?

Yours
René

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

Posted by sebgoa <ru...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote:
>> Hey
>> 
>> Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I
>> would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML.
>> 
>> I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in
>> notifications about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds.
>> 
>> I am suggest to make a seprate ML for those who really want it.
>> 
>> Any thoughts?
>> 
> 
> The reasoning behind it is that this way all devs get the messages.
> But honestly, I'm not to happy either with it.
> 
> I actually have a filter on it since I want to read the messages on a
> mobile device as well and all those posts pollute my inbox.
> 
> But we also want these messages to be seen and resolved, but it's a
> difficult one.

I think we should be patient with this, and see how we are dealing with the PRs…

My gut feeling is to wait till september and asses then, whether we need to route these somewhere else.

Personnaly , I like seeing it on dev@, I filter JIRA and end up not checking the issues that often..

> 
> Wido
> 
>> Yours René
>> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVo5kNAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCFNoQAJ9ix/mQxLHc7Wq4VRwU4ZwA
> 4KbXL2VHO0/H0S2Kbf0cMC6sn1tkVq4eKpRMZTEvIz4jlDtMYbtyoYEtLXl67ae4
> EmyakOeLeXDIKZA20qDUzxqTi+R6zcWhLKaEM2scq445Bhw/9MjDNvPfIBNTXvCk
> Sgcq/LyxYZU61y3rFvc6Rx2jokHCFR34phYPMFrhp2BE5flZmSFp+q3ith0B508e
> LNVNCoOtyVZT3ZQuLafHulIb1mIm1qh0cFbtSUkWXxsN4z311AxZaDbmMSnXtlyX
> ksyyB7jJ6h/ImI+WwB9r12KOIbs0jeCYFSpY4gMv1jetMApvPrV+szOn2+xAFlds
> qgClTsTfa6aEv1xHIOqBjY4IHxtOvc70n1MAr/e5Q6MJpE/Mx2ncF79FqPnlqFrw
> Xhp11exgAYl/a6bkQ3ALkYXxrJFAd20UEK6iD5tPzSvgavNuYI+QkqzVs7bwC+Kn
> BhJ2cq+p4x8qk8UfzAO8rS1yEtjqrqFpYtRduhmpsR7kdVJmTYkryyQpvhfrVwde
> AR3Tzl+kF18+DR8GDUgmRtpnmNCNaTqVvygkBNr2M2b9TaCyKd56dxd8t+f2StQw
> D7QF9kGNF96DS/wSUwAXCnPCH0KluJFxAV8y5ewYwGznmlc8sVQ6ohyhV6eiZcBi
> AtjGlXKrCaLrPVm28PV+
> =5hwi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hey
> 
> Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I
> would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML.
> 
> I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in
> notifications about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds.
> 
> I am suggest to make a seprate ML for those who really want it.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 

The reasoning behind it is that this way all devs get the messages.
But honestly, I'm not to happy either with it.

I actually have a filter on it since I want to read the messages on a
mobile device as well and all those posts pollute my inbox.

But we also want these messages to be seen and resolved, but it's a
difficult one.

Wido

> Yours René
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=5hwi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Discuss] separate ML for PR and build notification?

Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
On 13-Jul-2015, at 1:41 pm, Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net>> wrote:

Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I would
bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the dev ML.

I like to be in dev ML but I am not that interested in notifications
about builds on PR, PR comments, and Jenkins builds.

I am suggest to make a seprate ML for those who really want it.

Any thoughts?

I think this was raised before, the quickest solution is to add email filters to move emails by from/to fields to specific folders.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com<ma...@shapeblue.com>
Blog: bhaisaab.org<http://bhaisaab.org> | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.