svnserve: fork or threads?

["T. Wassermann" <ma...@tobias-wassermann.de>]

Hi,

I'm writing a german book about subversion and I also use subversion 
very extensive for my project.

Now I have a question without any answer: When should I use svnserve -d 
and when svnserve -d -T. The questions is: What's better on forking 
svnserve new connections or what's better on create a thread for a new 
connection? If there is no direct answer (or answers like "it's your 
choice..."): What is the matter of the -T option? Why does svnserve have 
it (i believe, this must make sense :-) )?

Regards


Tobias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svnserve: fork or threads?

[Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>]

On 6/9/06, T. Wassermann <ma...@tobias-wassermann.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a german book about subversion and I also use subversion
> very extensive for my project.
>
> Now I have a question without any answer: When should I use svnserve -d
> and when svnserve -d -T. The questions is: What's better on forking
> svnserve new connections or what's better on create a thread for a new
> connection? If there is no direct answer (or answers like "it's your
> choice..."): What is the matter of the -T option? Why does svnserve have
> it (i believe, this must make sense :-) )?