You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/20 15:11:28 UTC
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Skipping r15???
On May 20, 2013 3:03 PM, <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
> Skip R15B02, R15B01, R15B, R14B03 for Travis tests.
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/repo
> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/commit/46b141dd
> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tree/46b141dd
> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/diff/46b141dd
>
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Commit: 46b141dddb9e615b640aa4d304c92ab843f928a1
> Parents: 187cec1
> Author: Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@apache.org>
> Authored: Mon May 20 15:02:53 2013 +0200
> Committer: Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@apache.org>
> Committed: Mon May 20 15:02:53 2013 +0200
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> .travis.yml | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/blob/46b141dd/.travis.yml
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> index 70d4d17..827badf 100644
> --- a/.travis.yml
> +++ b/.travis.yml
> @@ -11,8 +11,4 @@ language: erlang
> otp_release:
> - R16B
> - R15B03
> - - R15B02
> - - R15B01
> - - R15B
> - R14B04
> - - R14B03
>
>
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
Then I should just let the test fail as a constant reminder for us
that we need to do something ;)
- benoit
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyway are these just tests failing or an issue in our support for these
>> versions? Do we also need to update the doc?
>
> Since we have also have a few builds passing, it looks like those
> releases are more sensitive to intermittent issues with our tests.
>
> What documentation do you have in mind for updating? I don't think we
> know enough to actually declare those releases unsupported.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On May 20, 2013, at 22:58 , Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was thinking to the INSTALL doc. If e know that these versions are
>> broken maybe we should tell it when the 1.3.1 will be released.
>>
>> Or just fix it, then I wonder why removing it. Maybe we need such
>> pressure to fix these errors ;)
>
> I don't think those versions are strictly broken, since the failures
> are intermittent, but it's sure nice if Travis doesn't fail so much.
> And I'm not sure the pressure is high enough to get people to look at
> intermittent issues? Also, Travis doesn't really seem to give a whole
> lot of context to make it easy to see why tests fail (but that might
> just be me).
Nope, +1, that’s my reasoning as well.
Ideally, once we have proper CI set up, we will be testing against all
possible dependency combinations that we want to support, but can’t have
that on Travis anyway, so we may as well slim this down a little and
keep it around as a public sanity check.
Jan
--
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking to the INSTALL doc. If e know that these versions are
> broken maybe we should tell it when the 1.3.1 will be released.
>
> Or just fix it, then I wonder why removing it. Maybe we need such
> pressure to fix these errors ;)
I don't think those versions are strictly broken, since the failures
are intermittent, but it's sure nice if Travis doesn't fail so much.
And I'm not sure the pressure is high enough to get people to look at
intermittent issues? Also, Travis doesn't really seem to give a whole
lot of context to make it easy to see why tests fail (but that might
just be me).
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyway are these just tests failing or an issue in our support for these
>> versions? Do we also need to update the doc?
>
> Since we have also have a few builds passing, it looks like those
> releases are more sensitive to intermittent issues with our tests.
>
> What documentation do you have in mind for updating? I don't think we
> know enough to actually declare those releases unsupported.
I was thinking to the INSTALL doc. If e know that these versions are
broken maybe we should tell it when the 1.3.1 will be released.
Or just fix it, then I wonder why removing it. Maybe we need such
pressure to fix these errors ;)
- benoit
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway are these just tests failing or an issue in our support for these
> versions? Do we also need to update the doc?
Since we have also have a few builds passing, it looks like those
releases are more sensitive to intermittent issues with our tests.
What documentation do you have in mind for updating? I don't think we
know enough to actually declare those releases unsupported.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On May 20, 2013 3:15 PM, "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Skipping r15???
>
> No, just older R15 and R14 releases. You'll note R15B03 is still here.
>
> Discussed this with Jan in IRC after I observed that R15B and R15B01
> were somewhat more likely to fail our tests on Travis.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
OK. I didn't' see the Travis mails recently. Odd.
Anyway are these just tests failing or an issue in our support for these
versions? Do we also need to update the doc?
Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 46b141d
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Skipping r15???
No, just older R15 and R14 releases. You'll note R15B03 is still here.
Discussed this with Jan in IRC after I observed that R15B and R15B01
were somewhat more likely to fail our tests on Travis.
Cheers,
Dirkjan