newbie question about bayesian filter

[Miguel <mm...@123.com.sv>]

Dear All, im using SA in a central system wide dedicated filter, so i 
dont have any account in it, the "clean" emails are forwarded to the 
final destination servers.
In this scenario, nobody will be training SA, so, does it make sense to 
use the bayesian filter at all? ,or SA will still use the bayesian 
filter from the day to day spam/ham hit ratios?

Thanks
---
Miguel

Re: newbie question about bayesian filter

[maillist <ma...@emailacs.com>]

Miguel wrote:
> Dear All, im using SA in a central system wide dedicated filter, so i 
> dont have any account in it, the "clean" emails are forwarded to the 
> final destination servers.
> In this scenario, nobody will be training SA, so, does it make sense 
> to use the bayesian filter at all? ,or SA will still use the bayesian 
> filter from the day to day spam/ham hit ratios?
>
> Thanks
> ---
> Miguel
>

I don't know about anyone else, but the bayes system *to me* is the 
bread & butter of spamassassin, and *for me* makes the whole process 
painless.  If I get spam that doesn't score high enough, I run "sa-learn 
--spam /path/to/file" and I never see that spam again.

But then again, I use one server, and have less than 100 users, so doing 
this manually is not a bad idea for me.