Re: is socketappendertestcase, xmlsocketappendertestcase being run in any log4cxx tests ? found download site

[Bernard Stumpf <be...@verizon.net>]

Sorry, I found the download site. It's
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/download.html and its release log4j 
1.2.15

-Bernie Stumpf

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: is socketappendertestcase, xmlsocketappendertestcase being 
run in any log4cxx tests ?
Date: 	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:21:21 -0400
From: 	Bernard Stumpf <be...@verizon.net>
Reply-To: 	Log4CXX Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>
To: 	Log4CXX Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>
References: 	<47...@verizon.net> 
<04...@apache.org>



Thanks for this info.  Looking over the Ant build.xml file, I see that 
to run the target run-socketserver it needs a log4j-xxx.jar which it 
finds in either  ~/.m2/repository/log4j/log4j/1.2.14/log4j-1.2.14.jar or 
in /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar

  How does this log4j-xxx.jar get there?  I do not see how the POM.xml 
gets it to the ~/.m2/repository either.

  Can you provide info on where to obtain log4j-<version>.jar from?

thanks,
-Bernie Stumpf

Curt Arnold wrote on 04/02.18:04:

>
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Bernard Stumpf wrote:
>
>> I've searched for evidence that any of the SocketAppender test cases  
>> were run by the log4cxx tests, and it appears that these tests are  
>> not run. The only related one is "sockethubappendertestcase:   
>> SUCCESS", but that is not a client logger case, I think.
>>
>> Looking through the log4cxx issues:
>>   LOGCXX-164: XMLSocketAppender is disabled - is marked fixed.
>>   LOGCXX-165  XMLSocketAppender may generate erroneous output - also  
>> marked fixed.
>>
>> Please explain.  Should there be a SocketAppender test case run as  
>> part of the log4cxx tests?
>>
>> -Bernie Stumpf
>>
>
> Sorry not to get back to you.  The test you mention are not run since  
> they are guarded by an APR_HAS_THREADS, but no APR header files is  
> included that could potentially set that macro.  If you add an
>
> #include "apr.h"
>
> before the
>
> #if defined(APR_HAS_THREADS)
>
> then the test should run (though they don't do much) on every common  
> platform except Cygwin.  I considered, but decided against, trying to  
> fix that in RC8.
>
>