You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by "Adam W. Dace" <co...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/13 16:45:42 UTC
Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a
cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my parent web cache. :-)
Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if
anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
Thanks In Advance,
--
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <co...@gmail.com>
Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <ad...@turing.com>
Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by "Adam W. Dace" <co...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the tip! I didn't realize I could just "yum upgrade" myself
from CentOS 6.2 up to 6.4.
I'll have to give that a shot once I get everything up and running.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>wrote:
> i do *not* understand your argumentation
>
> * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade"
> * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job
> * why does security not bother somebody these days?
> * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
>
> that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine"
> no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9
>
> Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth.
> >
> > I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for
> a while and they are awesome.
> > However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config
> like crazy in an attempt
> > to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
> >
> > I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and
> these wonderful people include
> > 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their
> distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me.
> >
> > Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a
> virtual machine and give it a shot. :-)
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net<mailto:
> h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found
> a cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
> > > parent web cache. :-)
> > >
> > > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was
> wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
> >
> > besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
> > current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
> > is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
> > you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
> > but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
> >
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
> > Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
> > Von: Mohd Akhbar <mymohaja@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:
> users@trafficserver.apache.org>
> > An: users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:
> users@trafficserver.apache.org>
> >
> > Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
>
>
--
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <co...@gmail.com>
Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <ad...@turing.com>
Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by "Adam W. Dace" <co...@gmail.com>.
Thanks James.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:31 AM, James Peach <jp...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> > i do *not* understand your argumentation
> >
> > * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade"
> > * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job
> > * why does security not bother somebody these days?
> > * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
> >
> > that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine"
> > no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9
>
> Let's not get off-topic here.
>
> Adam, we don't have a CentOS 6.2 build bot, but we support 5.x and 6.x. I
> think that you will be fine.
>
> J
>
> >
> > Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> >> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes,
> bandwidth.
> >>
> >> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache
> for a while and they are awesome.
> >> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config
> like crazy in an attempt
> >> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
> >>
> >> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and
> these wonderful people include
> >> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their
> distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a
> virtual machine and give it a shot. :-)
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net<mailto:
> h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> >>> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a
> cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
> >>> parent web cache. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was
> wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
> >>
> >> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
> >> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
> >> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
> >> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
> >> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
> >>
> >>
> >> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
> >> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
> >> Von: Mohd Akhbar <mymohaja@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >> Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:
> users@trafficserver.apache.org>
> >> An: users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:
> users@trafficserver.apache.org>
> >>
> >> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
> >
>
>
--
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <co...@gmail.com>
Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <ad...@turing.com>
Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by James Peach <jp...@apache.org>.
On Oct 13, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net> wrote:
> i do *not* understand your argumentation
>
> * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade"
> * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job
> * why does security not bother somebody these days?
> * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
>
> that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine"
> no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9
Let's not get off-topic here.
Adam, we don't have a CentOS 6.2 build bot, but we support 5.x and 6.x. I think that you will be fine.
J
>
> Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
>> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth.
>>
>> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a while and they are awesome.
>> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like crazy in an attempt
>> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
>>
>> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these wonderful people include
>> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me.
>>
>> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a virtual machine and give it a shot. :-)
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net <ma...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
>>> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
>>> parent web cache. :-)
>>>
>>> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
>>
>> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
>> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
>> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
>> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
>> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
>>
>>
>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
>> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
>> Von: Mohd Akhbar <mymohaja@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org <ma...@trafficserver.apache.org>
>> An: users@trafficserver.apache.org <ma...@trafficserver.apache.org>
>>
>> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
>
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.
i do *not* understand your argumentation
* if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade"
* if you have a managed server demand them to do their job
* why does security not bother somebody these days?
* CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine"
no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9
Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth.
>
> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a while and they are awesome.
> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like crazy in an attempt
> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
>
> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these wonderful people include
> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me.
>
> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a virtual machine and give it a shot. :-)
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net <ma...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
> > parent web cache. :-)
> >
> > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
>
> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
> Von: Mohd Akhbar <mymohaja@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org <ma...@trafficserver.apache.org>
> An: users@trafficserver.apache.org <ma...@trafficserver.apache.org>
>
> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by "Adam W. Dace" <co...@gmail.com>.
The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth.
I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a
while and they are awesome.
However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config
like crazy in an attempt
to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these
wonderful people include
2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro
is a little old honestly doesn't bother me.
Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a
virtual machine and give it a shot. :-)
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>wrote:
>
> Am 13.10.2013 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a
> cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
> > parent web cache. :-)
> >
> > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering
> if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
>
> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
> Von: Mohd Akhbar <my...@gmail.com>
> Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org
> An: users@trafficserver.apache.org
>
> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
>
>
--
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <co...@gmail.com>
Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <ad...@turing.com>
Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.
Am 13.10.2013 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my
> parent web cache. :-)
>
> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it.
besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
Von: Mohd Akhbar <my...@gmail.com>
Antwort an: users@trafficserver.apache.org
An: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1