how about integrate profiling into development module?

[Jörn Nettingsmeier <ne...@apache.org>]

hi!

i was wondering, would it make sense to integrate the profiling module 
into the development module?

if so, should we introduce a new top-level menu item "development"? 
currently, "profiling" goes under "file", but only in the admin area 
(dunno why i did that, seems stupid now that i think of it), and "show 
log" ends up in "help", which is also weird.

that said, for "show log" i see
http://localhost:8888/default/authoring/news.html?lenya.module=development&lenya.action=showLog
.
is this still recommended or a 1.2 leftover that should be deprecated 
and removed? imo, it's not nice, since it's a totally new and unrelated 
page, and that should be reflected in the base URI, not the querystring. 
so what about /default/modules/development/log.txt instead?

regards,

jörn



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org

Re: how about integrate profiling into development module?

[Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>]

Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:
> hi!
> 
> i was wondering, would it make sense to integrate the profiling module
> into the development module?

-0.5

It certainly addresses a development issue, but I prefer granular
modules. Maybe more development-related functions are to come, and I
don't think we should put all of them into a single module.

Maybe we have to add module tags (categories) someday.


> if so, should we introduce a new top-level menu item "development"?

+1

> currently, "profiling" goes under "file", but only in the admin area
> (dunno why i did that, seems stupid now that i think of it), and "show
> log" ends up in "help", which is also weird.
> 
> that said, for "show log" i see
> http://localhost:8888/default/authoring/news.html?lenya.module=development&lenya.action=showLog
> 
> .
> is this still recommended or a 1.2 leftover that should be deprecated
> and removed? 

Neither of them, the lenya.module parameter was the first approach
to access a module that came into my mind.

> imo, it's not nice, since it's a totally new and unrelated
> page, and that should be reflected in the base URI, not the querystring.
> so what about /default/modules/development/log.txt instead?

Yes, this would be a better URL.

Or maybe /modules/development/log4j.log:

- the publication isn't important
- it would be clearer which log file is shown


-- Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org