c99

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I'm guessing we all heard the news that Linux is switching
to c99 from c89.

Time for us to consider it as well?

Re: c99

[Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:54 AM Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> I'm guessing we all heard the news that Linux is switching
> to c99 from c89.
>
> Time for us to consider it as well?

I thought they were skipping over c99 and going to c11.
I think httpd has an extra wrinkle with legacy OS and compiler
combinations (I certainly do in the distribution I look after).

It would be nice to keep it optional (like the PCRE thing) or limited
to new modules or something post-2.4 but I recognize those are all
kind of a lot to ask.

Re: [External] c99

["Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>]

Hi Jim,

I read Linus' statements on it and it really had to do with a technical 
use case that I think this article spells out well: 
https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-prepares-to-move-the-linux-kernel-to-modern-c/

I think we need something similar.  What is the reason for this change 
besides just modernizing?

Regards,
KAM

On 3/3/2022 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> RAPTOR REMARK: Alert! Please be careful! This email is from an EXTERNAL sender. Be aware of impersonation and credential theft.
>
> I'm guessing we all heard the news that Linux is switching
> to c99 from c89.
>
> Time for us to consider it as well?

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
KMcGrail@Apache.org

Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171