You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Andreas Schildbach <an...@schildbach.de> on 2004/02/06 18:22:48 UTC
Latest Subclipse Build and Library Path?
Hello everyone,
I just tried
Subclipse Pre-Release All-in One Build
subclipse-M6-all-r403.zip
MD5: ed579ec7bab82756210bf4593fd95759
from http://www.loonsoft.com/downloads/
on Eclipe 3.0M6 on Windows XP.
When trying to access my (0.33) SVN server, Subclipse complains about a
missing libdb42.dll. I had to copy this (and the other dll's) over to
c:\windows\system32 in order for Subclipse to work as intended.
Is this expected behaviour? Why doesn't Subclipse search in the
eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subclipse...-path?
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Latest Subclipse Build and Library Path?
Posted by Ulrich Eckhardt <ec...@satorlaser.com>.
On Friday 06 February 2004 19:22, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> When trying to access my (0.33) SVN server, Subclipse complains about a
> missing libdb42.dll. I had to copy this (and the other dll's) over to
> c:\windows\system32 in order for Subclipse to work as intended.
There are a few other places where the OS searches for libraries, in
particular you can set %PATH%. See the docs for more.
> Is this expected behaviour?
It's not surprising, at least.
> Why doesn't Subclipse search in the
> eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subclipse...-path?
It's not even Subclipse that does the searching, but the win32 runtime linker.
Maybe Subclipse could have added workarounds, is the behaviour a regression
from older versions?
Uli
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org