another merge improvement?

[robert engels <re...@ix.netcom.com>]

Is there a way to get a IndexInput with a larger buffer "sometimes"?

Since the fields/documents and terms processing are basically  
sequential, it would seem that merging would benefit from a much  
larger buffer size.

The recent changes alleviate this a bit for document merging, since  
the document will be read as an entire byte array, but is probably  
only helpful for large documents.

This change would work well in all cases.

Thoughts?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: another merge improvement?

[robert engels <re...@ix.netcom.com>]

Sorry, ignore this... I work of the 1.9 codebase. I see that 2.2  
already has this...

On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:20 PM, robert engels wrote:

> Is there a way to get a IndexInput with a larger buffer "sometimes"?
>
> Since the fields/documents and terms processing are basically  
> sequential, it would seem that merging would benefit from a much  
> larger buffer size.
>
> The recent changes alleviate this a bit for document merging, since  
> the document will be read as an entire byte array, but is probably  
> only helpful for large documents.
>
> This change would work well in all cases.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org