You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Angela Schreiber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/27 13:51:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SLING-9857) Intermediate path is ignored if user/group already exists

Angela Schreiber created SLING-9857:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: Intermediate path is ignored if user/group already exists
                 Key: SLING-9857
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9857
             Project: Sling
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Repoinit
            Reporter: Angela Schreiber


Sling repoinit allows to create users/groups/service users with an optional intermediate path (absolute or relative):

{code}
create service user my-feature-service with path system/my-feature
create user my-feature-user with path /home/users/my-feature
create group my-feature-group with path my-feature
{code}

however, in case the user/group/service user already exists the intermediate path will be ignored.

imo, there should be a way to make sure the intermediate path is respected upon execution of {{CreateUser}}, {{CreateGroup}} and {{CreateServiceUser}} operations.

for example:

h4. always verify and adjust path if needed
in {{UserVisitor}}: if a group/user/service user already exists and the create-operation includes a path (i.e. {{getPath()}} doesn't return {{null}}), verify that {{Authorizable.getPath()}} is a descendant of that path. If that's not the case move the corresponding node by either deleting and recreating the user/group/service user or by actually moving.

h4. global configuration option
expand the repoinit such that handling of intermediate path can be configured for all statements. for example add a configuration option to {{JcrRepoInitOpsProcessorImpl}}. {{UserVisitor}} would only perform the verification and potentially move, if the configuration option mandates it.
the configuration could either be a simple boolean flag for this particular case or be more sophisticated like e.g. {{http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/importmode.html}}.

h4. expand repo-init statements
if enforcing intermediate paths should not be dealt on a global level but on a case by case basis, the create user/group/service user statements needed to be expanded to allow for more fine-grained setup.  as with the previous option it could be a simple flag or follow the example of {{Jackrabbit-fvault}}, which defines a variety of import modes (see http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/importmode.html).

h4. on a general note: 
i see the benefit of the fine-grain import-modes (and ac-handling flags on top of that, http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/apidocs/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/io/AccessControlHandling)) in jackrabbit-fvault. however, in a repository setup with many features, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage and my personal preference would be rather be to keep it simple.
note though SLING-6423: the fvault ac-handling flags already found their way into the parser (implementation still missing though). so, maybe this issue here in combination with SLING-6423 could be used to make a conscious decision about the future development of repo-init and whether or not additional flexibility is desirable/needed.





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)