You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@mahout.apache.org by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/09 23:42:55 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Quick reminder for the next release:
It is important that at least one set of eyes examine the licensing aspects
of the release. This includes running RAT, making sure that bigs and bobs
are named accurately and that the NOTICE and LICENSE files are correct.
We should have different people check different things next time.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
> looks
> > good to me
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
> testing
> > the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
> this
> > release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
> locally,
> > I
> > > am fine with this release.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> > >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ah... forgot this.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> > >> {binary,source}
> > >>> x
> > >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
> artifact
> > >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
> it
> > >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
> the
> > >>>>> release to pass.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
> signatures.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <
> pat@occamsmachete.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> > >> Will
> > >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >>>>>> artifacts
> > >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> > >> of
> > >>> my
> > >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > >>> correctly
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> > >> +1
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > >>> work
> > >>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
+1 from non-PMC :)
iPhone'd
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 12:25, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
>
> Thanks again.
>
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
>> good to me
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
>> the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
>> release.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>> On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
>> I
>>> am fine with this release.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>>>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>>>> {binary,source}
>>>>> x
>>>>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>>>> Will
>>>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>>>> of
>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>>>> correctly
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>>>> +1
>>>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>>>> work
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Reminder, we are still in code freeze; please do not push anything to
master until the release is final.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
> looks
> > good to me
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
> testing
> > the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
> this
> > release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
> locally,
> > I
> > > am fine with this release.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> > >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ah... forgot this.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> > >> {binary,source}
> > >>> x
> > >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
> artifact
> > >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
> it
> > >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
> the
> > >>>>> release to pass.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
> signatures.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <
> pat@occamsmachete.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> > >> Will
> > >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >>>>>> artifacts
> > >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> > >> of
> > >>> my
> > >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > >>> correctly
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> > >> +1
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > >>> work
> > >>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Quick reminder for the next release:
It is important that at least one set of eyes examine the licensing aspects
of the release. This includes running RAT, making sure that bigs and bobs
are named accurately and that the NOTICE and LICENSE files are correct.
We should have different people check different things next time.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
> looks
> > good to me
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
> testing
> > the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
> this
> > release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
> locally,
> > I
> > > am fine with this release.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> > >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ah... forgot this.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> > >> {binary,source}
> > >>> x
> > >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
> artifact
> > >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
> it
> > >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
> the
> > >>>>> release to pass.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
> signatures.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <
> pat@occamsmachete.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> > >> Will
> > >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >>>>>> artifacts
> > >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> > >> of
> > >>> my
> > >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > >>> correctly
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> > >> +1
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > >>> work
> > >>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Reminder, we are still in code freeze; please do not push anything to
master until the release is final.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
> passed and the Voting officially closes.
> Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
> looks
> > good to me
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
> testing
> > the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
> this
> > release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
> locally,
> > I
> > > am fine with this release.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> > >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ah... forgot this.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> > >> {binary,source}
> > >>> x
> > >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
> artifact
> > >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
> it
> > >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
> the
> > >>>>> release to pass.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
> signatures.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <
> pat@occamsmachete.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> > >> Will
> > >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >>>>>> artifacts
> > >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> > >> of
> > >>> my
> > >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > >>> correctly
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> > >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> > >> +1
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > >>> work
> > >>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Suneel
> > >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
> good to me
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
> the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
> release.
>
> +1 (binding)
> On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
> I
> > am fine with this release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah... forgot this.
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> >> {binary,source}
> >>> x
> >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> >>>>
> >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> >>>>> release to pass.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> >> Will
> >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> >>>>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> >> of
> >>> my
> >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> >>> correctly
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> >> +1
> >>>>> votes
> >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> >>> work
> >>>>>> over
> >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
> good to me
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
> the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
> release.
>
> +1 (binding)
> On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
> I
> > am fine with this release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah... forgot this.
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> >> {binary,source}
> >>> x
> >>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> >>>>
> >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> >>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> >>>>> release to pass.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> >> Will
> >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> >>>>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> >> of
> >>> my
> >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> >>> correctly
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> >> +1
> >>>>> votes
> >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> >>> work
> >>>>>> over
> >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
> am fine with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>> {binary,source}
>>> x
>>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>> Will
>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>> of
>>> my
>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>> correctly
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>> +1
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>> work
>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
> am fine with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>> {binary,source}
>>> x
>>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>> Will
>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>> of
>>> my
>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>> correctly
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>> +1
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>> work
>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am
happy with this release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
> am fine with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>> {binary,source}
>>> x
>>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>> Will
>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>> of
>>> my
>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>> correctly
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>> +1
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>> work
>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, am happy
with this release
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
> am fine with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
>> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah... forgot this.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
>> {binary,source}
>>> x
>>>> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
>>>> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
>>>> seems a good thing to do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>>>>> release to pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
>> Will
>>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running on EMR now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
>> of
>>> my
>>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
>>> correctly
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
>> +1
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
>>> work
>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Suneel
>>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah... forgot this.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> {binary,source}
> > x
> > > {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >
> > > One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> > > doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> > > seems a good thing to do.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>
> > >> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> > >> release to pass.
> > >>
> > >> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Suneel
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> Will
> > >> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Running on EMR now.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >> > artifacts
> > >> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> of
> > my
> > >> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > correctly
> > >> > from
> > >> > > the artifacts.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> +1
> > >> votes
> > >> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > work
> > >> > over
> > >> > > the past few weeks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Suneel
> > >> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah... forgot this.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> {binary,source}
> > x
> > > {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> > >
> > > One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> > > doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> > > seems a good thing to do.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> > >>
> > >> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> > >> release to pass.
> > >>
> > >> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Suneel
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> Will
> > >> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Running on EMR now.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > >> > artifacts
> > >> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
> of
> > my
> > >> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> > correctly
> > >> > from
> > >> > > the artifacts.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
> +1
> > >> votes
> > >> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> > work
> > >> > over
> > >> > > the past few weeks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Suneel
> > >> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah... forgot this.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source}
> x
> > {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> >
> > One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> > doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> > seems a good thing to do.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >>
> >> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> >> release to pass.
> >>
> >> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >>
> >>
> >> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >>
> >> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Suneel
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> >> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Running on EMR now.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> >> > artifacts
> >> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
> my
> >> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> correctly
> >> > from
> >> > > the artifacts.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> >> > >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >> > >
> >> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> >> votes
> >> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> work
> >> > over
> >> > > the past few weeks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Suneel
> >> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah... forgot this.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source}
> x
> > {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
> >
> > One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> > doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> > seems a good thing to do.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >>
> >> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> >> release to pass.
> >>
> >> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >>
> >>
> >> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >>
> >> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Suneel
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> >> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Running on EMR now.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> >> > artifacts
> >> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
> my
> >> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> correctly
> >> > from
> >> > > the artifacts.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> >> > >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >> > >
> >> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> >> votes
> >> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> work
> >> > over
> >> > > the past few weeks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Suneel
> >> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>
> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> seems a good thing to do.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>
>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>> release to pass.
>>
>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>
>>
>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>
>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Suneel
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
>> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Running on EMR now.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>> > artifacts
>> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
>> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
>> > from
>> > > the artifacts.
>> > >
>> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>> > >
>> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
>> votes
>> > > for the candidate release to pass.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
>> > over
>> > > the past few weeks.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Suneel
>> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>
> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> seems a good thing to do.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>>
>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
>> release to pass.
>>
>> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>>
>>
>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>>
>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Suneel
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
>> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Running on EMR now.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
>> > artifacts
>> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
>> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
>> > from
>> > > the artifacts.
>> > >
>> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>> > >
>> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
>> votes
>> > > for the candidate release to pass.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
>> > over
>> > > the past few weeks.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Suneel
>> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Checking the past releases, the artifacts names have always been
'mahout-distribution-*'. We could change that to
'apache-mahout-distribution-*' for future releases.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>
> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> seems a good thing to do.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >
> > The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> > release to pass.
> >
> > Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >
> >
> > Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >
> > Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suneel
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> > > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Running on EMR now.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > > artifacts
> > > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
> my
> > > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> > > from
> > > > the artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > > >
> > > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> > votes
> > > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> work
> > > over
> > > > the past few weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Suneel
> > > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Checking the past releases, the artifacts names have always been
'mahout-distribution-*'. We could change that to
'apache-mahout-distribution-*' for future releases.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
> {zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
>
> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
> seems a good thing to do.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >
> > The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> > release to pass.
> >
> > Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >
> >
> > Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >
> > Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suneel
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> > > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Running on EMR now.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > > artifacts
> > > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
> my
> > > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> > > from
> > > > the artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > > >
> > > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> > votes
> > > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
> work
> > > over
> > > > the past few weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Suneel
> > > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>
> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> release to pass.
>
> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>
>
> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>
> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Running on EMR now.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > artifacts
> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> > from
> > > the artifacts.
> > >
> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >
> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> votes
> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > >
> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
> > over
> > > the past few weeks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Suneel
> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include "apache". Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
>
> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
> release to pass.
>
> Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
>
>
> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
>
> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> > require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Running on EMR now.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> > artifacts
> > > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> > > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> > from
> > > the artifacts.
> > >
> > > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> > >
> > > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
> votes
> > > for the candidate release to pass.
> > >
> > > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
> > over
> > > the past few weeks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Suneel
> > > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Running on EMR now.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>
> > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> artifacts
> > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> from
> > the artifacts.
> >
> > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >
> > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> > for the candidate release to pass.
> >
> > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
> over
> > the past few weeks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suneel
> > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Running on EMR now.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>
> > I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
> artifacts
> > buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> > local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
> from
> > the artifacts.
> >
> > Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >
> > The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> > for the candidate release to pass.
> >
> > Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
> over
> > the past few weeks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suneel
> > On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts
> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from
> the artifacts.
>
> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>
> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> for the candidate release to pass.
>
> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
> the past few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts
> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from
> the artifacts.
>
> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>
> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> for the candidate release to pass.
>
> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
> the past few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts
> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from
> the artifacts.
>
> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>
> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> for the candidate release to pass.
>
> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
> the past few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts
> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from
> the artifacts.
>
> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
>
> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
> for the candidate release to pass.
>
> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
> the past few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team