You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/05 14:08:29 UTC
[VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have tripped
over. We'd like to get this released in time for the Geronimo 1.2 final
version so fewer people will be seeing this problem.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
Built Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
Here's my +1
Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 5, 2007, at 8:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
I didn't see any problems. +1
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 (not sure if i voted before :)
On 3/7/07, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -dain
>
> On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> > All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> > Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> > tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> > Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> > problem.
> >
> > I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
> >
> > Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> > branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> > Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> > apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
> >
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Rick
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
-dain
On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Sorry for hijacking the vote thread, but I wonder why
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3/README.txt
>
> mentions about 'JavaMail Specification 1.4'. Shouldn't the version
> numbers be the same?
Only the 1.4 specifications are available on the web as html. The 1.4
additions are clearly marked in the docs as 1.4 features. The
references to 1.4 as the source of the API information in the readme are
correct as written.
Rick
>
> Jacek
>
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 3/5/07, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Sorry for hijacking the vote thread, but I wonder why
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3/README.txt
mentions about 'JavaMail Specification 1.4'. Shouldn't the version
numbers be the same?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Here is my +1 ... looks fine.
Guess your next in the barrel to get a pgp sig and release these
babies :)
On Mar 5, 2007, at 8:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 3/5/07, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have tripped
> over. We'd like to get this released in time for the Geronimo 1.2 final
> version so fewer people will be seeing this problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries:
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
the subject doesn't look quite right, but the artifacts do.
+1
david jencks
On Mar 5, 2007, at 8:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
+1
-David
On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with
> Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have
> tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the
> Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people will be seeing this
> problem.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
> Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3
> Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec/1.3/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Rick
>