You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@steve.apache.org by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/08 23:44:21 UTC

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (STEVE-37) Consider having multiple simultaneous elections

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STEVE-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sam Ruby updated STEVE-37:
--------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: That's really cool. I would be interested in seeing more graphs of different information you pull from these logs.
http://mobiusfinalfantasyhack.com)

> Consider having multiple simultaneous elections
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STEVE-37
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STEVE-37
>             Project: Steve
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> There were such a huge number of votes this time that it was very difficult to follow, especially since the different types of votes were not grouped together.
> I think it would have been a lot easier if all the Emeritus votes had been together on a separate vote. Or at least grouped together.
> Likewise the Board election was randomly hidden among the other votes.
> It should have been first, along with any other STV votes.
> Maybe there should have been 3 separate elections:
> Board+Omnibus
> Members
> Emeritus
> Or at least have them on separate top-level pages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)