You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2006/06/05 22:41:30 UTC
Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Howdy Folks,
I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
in ActiveMQ puts them in
geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Christoph Sturm <ch...@gmail.com>.
sorry :)
its https://svn.codehaus.org/activemq/trunk/activemq/
regards
chris
On 6/7/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Christoph Sturm <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > try http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/
>
> Nope. First, I assume that committers don't use HTTP. Second, that's
> Fisheye, and if you point SVN to it, you get
>
> svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/'
> svn: PROPFIND of '/': 501
> Method+PROPFIND+is+not+defined+in+RFC+2068+and+is+not+supported+by+the+Servlet+API+
> (http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org)
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> > On 6/6/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> > > What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code?
> > >
> > > I tried to update
> > > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> > > and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org
> > > says is my new SVN password).
> > >
> > > Then I tried to check out
> > > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> > > and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my
> > > public key.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Aaron
> > >
> > > On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > > I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
> > > >
> > > > On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> > > > > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> > > > > connectors from the console.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> > > > > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > Paul
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Hiram / James,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> > > > > > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > > > > Howdy Folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > > > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > > > > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > > > > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > > > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > > > > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > > > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hiram
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > christoph.sturm@gmail.com
> >
>
--
christoph.sturm@gmail.com
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
On 6/7/06, Christoph Sturm <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> try http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/
Nope. First, I assume that committers don't use HTTP. Second, that's
Fisheye, and if you point SVN to it, you get
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/'
svn: PROPFIND of '/': 501
Method+PROPFIND+is+not+defined+in+RFC+2068+and+is+not+supported+by+the+Servlet+API+
(http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org)
Thanks,
Aaron
> On 6/6/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> > What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code?
> >
> > I tried to update
> > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> > and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org
> > says is my new SVN password).
> >
> > Then I tried to check out
> > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> > and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my
> > public key.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
> > >
> > > On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> > > > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> > > > connectors from the console.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> > > > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hiram / James,
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> > > > > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > > > Howdy Folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > > > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > > > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > > > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> christoph.sturm@gmail.com
>
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Christoph Sturm <ch...@gmail.com>.
try http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/
On 6/6/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code?
>
> I tried to update
> svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org
> says is my new SVN password).
>
> Then I tried to check out
> svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my
> public key.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
> >
> > On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> > > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> > > connectors from the console.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
> > >
> > > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> > > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > > > Hiram / James,
> > > >
> > > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> > > > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > > Howdy Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
--
christoph.sturm@gmail.com
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code?
I tried to update
svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org
says is my new SVN password).
Then I tried to check out
svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my
public key.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
>
> On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> > connectors from the console.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
> >
> > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
> >
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > > Hiram / James,
> > >
> > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> > > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > Howdy Folks,
> > > >
> > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > > >
> > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> connectors from the console.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
>
> Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
>
> On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > Hiram / James,
> >
> > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > Howdy Folks,
> > >
> > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > >
> > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > >
> >
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
connectors from the console.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Hiram / James,
>
> Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
> the official G RC out tomorrow.
>
> thanks
>
> Matt
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
>
Request to release ActriveMQ 3.2.4
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Hiram / James,
Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get
the official G RC out tomorrow.
thanks
Matt
Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> in ActiveMQ puts them in
> geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
>
> Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
>
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi David,
Not really. We are already building a rar, its the 'general purpose'
we throw all our dependencies in it so that it will work in most app
servers kinda rar. I think I'll let customized rars be the job of
integrators or app servers. I think that this makes sense since it
will not help the ActiveMQ standalone distribution footprint if we try
to ship a customized rar version per app server that is out there.
On 6/5/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> +1, I think this is a good idea.
>
> Do you think the minimal rar we are building should move to amq? We
> might not be the only ones who would like it :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1, I think this is a good idea.
Do you think the minimal rar we are building should move to amq? We
might not be the only ones who would like it :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> in ActiveMQ puts them in
> geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
>
> Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Thanks Paul.. I'll put that on my dish too.
On 6/5/06, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hiram, I think that's a good idea since that code is so closely tied
> to geronimo and can easily be affected by changes to it. Case in
> point is that I recently debugged a problem in the geronimo console
> due to changes in 1.1 and ended up needing to patch the AMQ gbean
> code. I created JIRAs in both Geronimo and AMQ since I knew that this
> code is really in a cross section between the two projects.
>
> By the way, the patch I mentioned still needs to be applied so that
> connectors can be created from the 1.1 console:
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
>
> Also, there's a patch that prevents new connectors from being lost
> across server restarts:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Hiram, I think that's a good idea since that code is so closely tied
to geronimo and can easily be affected by changes to it. Case in
point is that I recently debugged a problem in the geronimo console
due to changes in 1.1 and ended up needing to patch the AMQ gbean
code. I created JIRAs in both Geronimo and AMQ since I knew that this
code is really in a cross section between the two projects.
By the way, the patch I mentioned still needs to be applied so that
connectors can be created from the 1.1 console:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
Also, there's a patch that prevents new connectors from being lost
across server restarts:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
Best wishes,
Paul
On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> in ActiveMQ puts them in
> geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
>
> Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
On 6/5/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> I think that is fine, as long as we get the activemq folks here (like
> you), to help us keep these gbeans in sync with the latest activemq.
>
+1
> * * *
>
> Completely unrelated... well sorta... I really think we should think
> about using activemq for all cluster or inter-geronimo node
> communication. Even if user wants to use another jms for their app, G
> would still use activemq as its messaging backbone.
>
> Btw... I love activemq... so maybe I'm biased.
>
lol! It does have some nice stuff in it. But lets not go that
crazy... Perhaps we just start be defining our clustering
requirements as nice set of interfaces that the default implementation
using some ultra fast messaging like ActiveMQ! :)
Regards,
Hiram
> --jason
>
>
> On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I think that is fine, as long as we get the activemq folks here (like
you), to help us keep these gbeans in sync with the latest activemq.
* * *
Completely unrelated... well sorta... I really think we should think
about using activemq for all cluster or inter-geronimo node
communication. Even if user wants to use another jms for their app, G
would still use activemq as its messaging backbone.
Btw... I love activemq... so maybe I'm biased.
--jason
On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> in ActiveMQ puts them in
> geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside
> of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
>
> Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>