You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> on 2007/12/01 00:23:35 UTC
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo / CXF
Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
Thanks,
Glen
Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and think
> the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF project. I've
> always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have been done in CXF to
> start off with.
>
> For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
> described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding for
> CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but should
> work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or for a CXF
> server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps can talk to
> it.
>
>
> Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd like to
> leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as I'd like to
> hear others thoughts about it.
>
> Dan
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo /
CXF
Posted by Ulhas Bhole <ul...@iona.com>.
Not necessarily, We can pickup the ORB component for test dependency on
other apache project where it will go from yoko.
-- Ulhas Bhole
James Mao wrote:
> But we should also do the interop test as well if we migrate it from
> YOKO, right?
> With Orbix?
>
> James
>
>> Well, by CORBA, I really mean IIOP, but that's a detail.
>>
>> Basically, it's a combination binding (like soap) + transport (http)
>> where the JAXB (for example) objects get mashalled down to corba
>> streamables (instead of soap) and send on the wire via the IIOP stuff.
>> The tooling is basically tools to do things like:
>> idl -> wsdl
>> wsdl -> idl
>> wsdl -> "wsdl with corba binding defined"
>> etc...
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday 30 November 2007, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>
>>> Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
>>> binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Glen
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>>>
>>>> I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and
>>>> think the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF
>>>> project. I've always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have
>>>> been done in CXF to start off with.
>>>>
>>>> For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
>>>> described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding
>>>> for CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but
>>>> should work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or
>>>> for a CXF server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps
>>>> can talk to it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd
>>>> like to leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as
>>>> I'd like to hear others thoughts about it.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo /
CXF
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
But we should also do the interop test as well if we migrate it from
YOKO, right?
With Orbix?
James
> Well, by CORBA, I really mean IIOP, but that's a detail.
>
> Basically, it's a combination binding (like soap) + transport (http)
> where the JAXB (for example) objects get mashalled down to corba
> streamables (instead of soap) and send on the wire via the IIOP stuff.
>
> The tooling is basically tools to do things like:
> idl -> wsdl
> wsdl -> idl
> wsdl -> "wsdl with corba binding defined"
> etc...
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Glen Mazza wrote:
>
>> Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
>> binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glen
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>>
>>> I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and
>>> think the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF
>>> project. I've always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have
>>> been done in CXF to start off with.
>>>
>>> For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
>>> described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding
>>> for CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but
>>> should work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or
>>> for a CXF server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps
>>> can talk to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd
>>> like to leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as
>>> I'd like to hear others thoughts about it.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>
>
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo / CXF
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Well, by CORBA, I really mean IIOP, but that's a detail.
Basically, it's a combination binding (like soap) + transport (http)
where the JAXB (for example) objects get mashalled down to corba
streamables (instead of soap) and send on the wire via the IIOP stuff.
The tooling is basically tools to do things like:
idl -> wsdl
wsdl -> idl
wsdl -> "wsdl with corba binding defined"
etc...
Dan
On Friday 30 November 2007, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
> binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and
> > think the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF
> > project. I've always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have
> > been done in CXF to start off with.
> >
> > For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
> > described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding
> > for CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but
> > should work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or
> > for a CXF server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps
> > can talk to it.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd
> > like to leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as
> > I'd like to hear others thoughts about it.
> >
> > Dan
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog