[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3266) RMContext inactiveNodes should have NodeId as map key

["Rohith (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14338106#comment-14338106 ] 

Rohith commented on YARN-3266:
------------------------------

bq. the key string should include the NM's port as well
This make sense to me instead of changing API. Taking over now, feel free to assign yourself if you have already started working on this.

> RMContext inactiveNodes should have NodeId as map key
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3266
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3266
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Chengbing Liu
>
> Under the default NM port configuration, which is 0, we have observed in the current version, "lost nodes" count is greater than the length of the lost node list. This will happen when we consecutively restart the same NM twice:
> * NM started at port 10001
> * NM restarted at port 10002
> * NM restarted at port 10003
> * NM:10001 timeout, {{ClusterMetrics#incrNumLostNMs()}}, # lost node=1; {{rmNode.context.getInactiveRMNodes().put(rmNode.nodeId.getHost(), rmNode)}}, {{inactiveNodes}} has 1 element
> * NM:10002 timeout, {{ClusterMetrics#incrNumLostNMs()}}, # lost node=2; {{rmNode.context.getInactiveRMNodes().put(rmNode.nodeId.getHost(), rmNode)}}, {{inactiveNodes}} still has 1 element
> Since we allow multiple NodeManagers on one host (as discussed in YARN-1888), {{inactiveNodes}} should be of type {{ConcurrentMap<NodeId, RMNode>}}. If this will break the current API, then the key string should include the NM's port as well.
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)