You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@xml.apache.org by Michael Paolini/Austin/IBM <pa...@us.ibm.com> on 2000/11/09 00:31:49 UTC
SOAP and SSL
Is the SSL work that was being done checked into the Apache SOAP base at
this point?
Thanks,
~Mike
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A doctor can bury his mistakes, an architect can only advise his client to
plant vines...." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Internet ID: paolini@us.ibm.com
IBM Internal e-mail ID: PAOLINI/Austin/IBM
Re: SOAP and SSL
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@watson.ibm.com>.
Hi George,
Would it be possible to consider committing just the SSL part? I would
really like to get a new release out and SSL support is important.
If I remember right that only entailed client-side changes, right?
Thanks,
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "George I Matkovits" <ma...@uswest.net>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: SOAP and SSL
> Sorry but not yet. I have been very busy doing the next thing with
encryption and authentication support. I have the new code (which
> is based on SSL) working and will post it later today when I add some
documentation. I am using Diffie-Hellman PKI as the base for
> symmetric tripleDES encryption and DSA signature generation. It took much
longer to design then I hoped for and I have not even logged
> in to get my EMAIl for the last 3 weeks. If SSL code complexity is 1 then
this is somewhere around 6 (I just deleted 20k lines of test
> code on Sunday, the current Apache Soap is around 15k lines -). I finally
got it all working last Friday and I have been testing it on
> NT and Linux. I noticed in my EMAIL that someone offered to check in my old
SSL code. This version is much, much better and will allow
> for the eventual signature and encryption support of individual XM Elements
in a store-and-forward environment where SSL becomes
> useless. I will need help in checking it in since it is lots of code.
> Regards - George
> p.s. I would very much like to get the opinion of some cryptographic guru at
IBM on the strength of the proposed algorithm
>
> Michael Paolini/Austin/IBM wrote:
>
> > Is the SSL work that was being done checked into the Apache SOAP base at
> > this point?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ~Mike
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > "A doctor can bury his mistakes, an architect can only advise his client
to
> > plant vines...." -Frank Lloyd Wright
> >
> > Internet ID: paolini@us.ibm.com
> > IBM Internal e-mail ID: PAOLINI/Austin/IBM
>
Re: SOAP and SSL
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@watson.ibm.com>.
Hi George,
Would it be possible to consider committing just the SSL part? I would
really like to get a new release out and SSL support is important.
If I remember right that only entailed client-side changes, right?
Thanks,
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "George I Matkovits" <ma...@uswest.net>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: SOAP and SSL
> Sorry but not yet. I have been very busy doing the next thing with
encryption and authentication support. I have the new code (which
> is based on SSL) working and will post it later today when I add some
documentation. I am using Diffie-Hellman PKI as the base for
> symmetric tripleDES encryption and DSA signature generation. It took much
longer to design then I hoped for and I have not even logged
> in to get my EMAIl for the last 3 weeks. If SSL code complexity is 1 then
this is somewhere around 6 (I just deleted 20k lines of test
> code on Sunday, the current Apache Soap is around 15k lines -). I finally
got it all working last Friday and I have been testing it on
> NT and Linux. I noticed in my EMAIL that someone offered to check in my old
SSL code. This version is much, much better and will allow
> for the eventual signature and encryption support of individual XM Elements
in a store-and-forward environment where SSL becomes
> useless. I will need help in checking it in since it is lots of code.
> Regards - George
> p.s. I would very much like to get the opinion of some cryptographic guru at
IBM on the strength of the proposed algorithm
>
> Michael Paolini/Austin/IBM wrote:
>
> > Is the SSL work that was being done checked into the Apache SOAP base at
> > this point?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ~Mike
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > "A doctor can bury his mistakes, an architect can only advise his client
to
> > plant vines...." -Frank Lloyd Wright
> >
> > Internet ID: paolini@us.ibm.com
> > IBM Internal e-mail ID: PAOLINI/Austin/IBM
>
Re: SOAP and SSL
Posted by George I Matkovits <ma...@uswest.net>.
Sorry but not yet. I have been very busy doing the next thing with encryption and authentication support. I have the new code (which
is based on SSL) working and will post it later today when I add some documentation. I am using Diffie-Hellman PKI as the base for
symmetric tripleDES encryption and DSA signature generation. It took much longer to design then I hoped for and I have not even logged
in to get my EMAIl for the last 3 weeks. If SSL code complexity is 1 then this is somewhere around 6 (I just deleted 20k lines of test
code on Sunday, the current Apache Soap is around 15k lines -). I finally got it all working last Friday and I have been testing it on
NT and Linux. I noticed in my EMAIL that someone offered to check in my old SSL code. This version is much, much better and will allow
for the eventual signature and encryption support of individual XM Elements in a store-and-forward environment where SSL becomes
useless. I will need help in checking it in since it is lots of code.
Regards - George
p.s. I would very much like to get the opinion of some cryptographic guru at IBM on the strength of the proposed algorithm
Michael Paolini/Austin/IBM wrote:
> Is the SSL work that was being done checked into the Apache SOAP base at
> this point?
>
> Thanks,
> ~Mike
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "A doctor can bury his mistakes, an architect can only advise his client to
> plant vines...." -Frank Lloyd Wright
>
> Internet ID: paolini@us.ibm.com
> IBM Internal e-mail ID: PAOLINI/Austin/IBM
Re: SOAP and SSL
Posted by George I Matkovits <ma...@uswest.net>.
Sorry but not yet. I have been very busy doing the next thing with encryption and authentication support. I have the new code (which
is based on SSL) working and will post it later today when I add some documentation. I am using Diffie-Hellman PKI as the base for
symmetric tripleDES encryption and DSA signature generation. It took much longer to design then I hoped for and I have not even logged
in to get my EMAIl for the last 3 weeks. If SSL code complexity is 1 then this is somewhere around 6 (I just deleted 20k lines of test
code on Sunday, the current Apache Soap is around 15k lines -). I finally got it all working last Friday and I have been testing it on
NT and Linux. I noticed in my EMAIL that someone offered to check in my old SSL code. This version is much, much better and will allow
for the eventual signature and encryption support of individual XM Elements in a store-and-forward environment where SSL becomes
useless. I will need help in checking it in since it is lots of code.
Regards - George
p.s. I would very much like to get the opinion of some cryptographic guru at IBM on the strength of the proposed algorithm
Michael Paolini/Austin/IBM wrote:
> Is the SSL work that was being done checked into the Apache SOAP base at
> this point?
>
> Thanks,
> ~Mike
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "A doctor can bury his mistakes, an architect can only advise his client to
> plant vines...." -Frank Lloyd Wright
>
> Internet ID: paolini@us.ibm.com
> IBM Internal e-mail ID: PAOLINI/Austin/IBM