Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] 10.0.2.1 release

[Andrew McIntyre <fu...@nonintuitive.com>]

On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries 
> that I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone 
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them 
> acceptable.

Passed, total of eight +1 votes. Jean, could you please update the 
website with the news?

I have also tagged 10.0.2.1 in subversion. Now that we have a release, 
and there are new features waiting to be checked in, I am planning on 
branching the 10.0 codeline and updating the version on the trunk to 
10.1.0.0 alpha so that new features can be checked in as per our 
version/upgrade policy. I will send out a separate note about that 
shortly.

andrew

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] 10.0.2.1 release

[myrnap <my...@Golux.Com>]

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries 
>> that I have posted here:
>>
>> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>>
>> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone 
>> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them 
>> acceptable.
>
>
> Passed, total of eight +1 votes. Jean, could you please update the 
> website with the news?
>
> I have also tagged 10.0.2.1 in subversion. Now that we have a release, 
> and there are new features waiting to be checked in, I am planning on 
> branching the 10.0 codeline and updating the version on the trunk to 
> 10.1.0.0 alpha so that new features can be checked in as per our 
> version/upgrade policy. I will send out a separate note about that 
> shortly.
>
> andrew
>
I have no objection, but the dblook message problem should be documented 
in a release notes entry (see derby 90).

Myrna