You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> on 2014/01/31 09:32:23 UTC
Open issues for 0.12 release
Hi,
there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
what is their status?
Best,
- Fabian
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi all
FYI: With r1571151 [1] the release-0.12 brach was upgraded to
0.12.1-SNAPSHOT. There is also an according version in JIRA. The
0.12.0 release will be created by using the apache-stanbol-0.12 tag
[2].
best
Rupert
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1571151
[2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-0.12/
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fabian, all,
>
> with STANBOL-1276 implemented and some other minor commits mainly
> concerning noisy INFO level logging I am done with all my planed
> changes for the 0.12.0 release.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>> Friday is very good for me, as I will be offline the whole day ^^
>>
>> So lets define that 0.12 is frozen starting from Fr Feb. 7th 00:00 GMT
>> until after the release was cut and voted.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Fabian Christ
>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> no Problem Rupert - I will reflect the latest changes. I did some
>>> attempts to cut the release and already created a release tag but I
>>> also need to commit a few changes.
>>>
>>> Anyway - a code freeze date would be a good idea for the 0.12 branch.
>>> This would be the deadline for creating a release tag from the branch.
>>> What date would you suggest? This Friday, Feb 7th?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> - Fabian
>>>
>>> 2014-02-04 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi (again),
>>>>
>>>> FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 branch
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
>>>>> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
>>>>>
>>>>> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
>>>>> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
>>>>> update the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> best
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
>>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>>>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>>>>>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> best
>>>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>>>>>>> what is their status?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian
>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Fabian, all,
with STANBOL-1276 implemented and some other minor commits mainly
concerning noisy INFO level logging I am done with all my planed
changes for the 0.12.0 release.
best
Rupert
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> Friday is very good for me, as I will be offline the whole day ^^
>
> So lets define that 0.12 is frozen starting from Fr Feb. 7th 00:00 GMT
> until after the release was cut and voted.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Fabian Christ
> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> no Problem Rupert - I will reflect the latest changes. I did some
>> attempts to cut the release and already created a release tag but I
>> also need to commit a few changes.
>>
>> Anyway - a code freeze date would be a good idea for the 0.12 branch.
>> This would be the deadline for creating a release tag from the branch.
>> What date would you suggest? This Friday, Feb 7th?
>>
>> Best,
>> - Fabian
>>
>> 2014-02-04 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi (again),
>>>
>>> FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 branch
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>
>>>> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
>>>> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
>>>>
>>>> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
>>>> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
>>>>
>>>> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
>>>> update the issue.
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>>>>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> best
>>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>>>>>> what is their status?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabian
>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Fabian,
Friday is very good for me, as I will be offline the whole day ^^
So lets define that 0.12 is frozen starting from Fr Feb. 7th 00:00 GMT
until after the release was cut and voted.
best
Rupert
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Fabian Christ
<ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no Problem Rupert - I will reflect the latest changes. I did some
> attempts to cut the release and already created a release tag but I
> also need to commit a few changes.
>
> Anyway - a code freeze date would be a good idea for the 0.12 branch.
> This would be the deadline for creating a release tag from the branch.
> What date would you suggest? This Friday, Feb 7th?
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> 2014-02-04 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi (again),
>>
>> FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 branch
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>
>>> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
>>> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
>>>
>>> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
>>> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
>>>
>>> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
>>> update the issue.
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>>>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best
>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>>>>> what is their status?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
no Problem Rupert - I will reflect the latest changes. I did some
attempts to cut the release and already created a release tag but I
also need to commit a few changes.
Anyway - a code freeze date would be a good idea for the 0.12 branch.
This would be the deadline for creating a release tag from the branch.
What date would you suggest? This Friday, Feb 7th?
Best,
- Fabian
2014-02-04 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
> Hi (again),
>
> FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 branch
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
>> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
>>
>> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
>> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
>>
>> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
>> update the issue.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>>>
>>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>>>
>>>
>>> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Fabian
>>>>
>>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>>>
>>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>>>
>>>>> best
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>>>> what is their status?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabian
>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi (again),
FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 branch
best
Rupert
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
>
> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
>
> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
> update the issue.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>>
>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>>
>>
>> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>>
>> Best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> - Fabian
>>>
>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>>
>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>>
>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>>> what is their status?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian
>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Fabian,
I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT
from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen?
Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked
this issue as fixed in 0.12.0.
So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to
update the issue.
best
Rupert
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>>
>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
>
>
> yep. Forgot to close ... done
>
> Best
> Rupert
>
>
>>
>> Best,
>> - Fabian
>>
>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>>
>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>>> resolution won't fix.
>>>
>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>>> what is their status?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Fabian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabian
>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabian
>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ
<ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks Rupert for having a look.
>
> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
yep. Forgot to close ... done
Best
Rupert
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
>> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>>
>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
>> resolution won't fix.
>>
>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>>
>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>>> what is their status?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> - Fabian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian
>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
thanks Rupert for having a look.
Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved?
Best,
- Fabian
2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Fabian,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
> <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
>
> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
> resolution won't fix.
>
> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>>
>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
>> what is their status?
>>
>> Best,
>> - Fabian
>>
>> --
>> Fabian
>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Open issues for 0.12 release
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Fabian,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ
<ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254
This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with
http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with
http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with
resolution won't fix.
IMO we can go for the 0.12 release
best
Rupert
>
> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or
> what is their status?
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen