You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/16 01:43:46 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-2992) Trace log statements in the replica
fetcher inner loop create large amounts of garbage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15059219#comment-15059219 ]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-2992:
------------------------------------
Thanks for reporting. I think it would be interesting to fix the issue generally. A combination of inline annotations and making the logger a class could do it, but needs testing.
> Trace log statements in the replica fetcher inner loop create large amounts of garbage
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-2992
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2992
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 0.8.2.1, 0.9.0.0
> Environment: Centos 6, Java 1.8.0_20
> Reporter: Cory Kolbeck
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: garbage, logging, trace
> Fix For: 0.8.1.2, 0.10.0.0
>
>
> We're seeing some GC pause issues in production, and during our investigation found that the thunks created during invocation of three trace statements guarded in the attached PR were responsible for ~98% of all allocations by object count and ~90% by size. While I'm not sure that this was actually the cause of our issue, it seems prudent to avoid useless allocations in a tight loop.
> I realize that the trace() call does its own guarding internally, however it's insufficient to prevent allocation of the thunk. I can work on getting profiling results to attach here, but I used YourKit and the license has since expired.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)