You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/24 14:10:23 UTC
Re: svn commit: r926991 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic problem...
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM, rwonly@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rwonly
> Date: Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> New Revision: 926991
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926991&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-5024 var/security/keystores seems to be a required directory, but is not being created for custom assemblies
>
> Modified:
> geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
>
> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml?rev=926991&r1=926990&r2=926991&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml (original)
> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> @@ -51,7 +51,14 @@
> <version>${version}</version>
> <type>car</type>
> </dependency>
> -
> +
> + <dependency>
> + <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.framework</groupId>
> + <artifactId>server-security-config</artifactId>
> + <version>${version}</version>
> + <type>car</type>
> + </dependency>
> +
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.modules</groupId>
> <artifactId>geronimo-activemq</artifactId>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r926991 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I agree. How about merge server-security-config car into
j2ee-security(actually I think we should rename the car as server-security)?
Will open a jira to track this.
2010/3/24 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
>
> I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config
> dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty
> certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic
> problem...
>
> --kevan
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM, rwonly@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: rwonly
> > Date: Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> > New Revision: 926991
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926991&view=rev
> > Log:
> > GERONIMO-5024 var/security/keystores seems to be a required directory,
> but is not being created for custom assemblies
> >
> > Modified:
> > geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> >
> > Modified:
> geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml?rev=926991&r1=926990&r2=926991&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> (original)
> > +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> > @@ -51,7 +51,14 @@
> > <version>${version}</version>
> > <type>car</type>
> > </dependency>
> > -
> > +
> > + <dependency>
> > + <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.framework</groupId>
> > + <artifactId>server-security-config</artifactId>
> > + <version>${version}</version>
> > + <type>car</type>
> > + </dependency>
> > +
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.modules</groupId>
> > <artifactId>geronimo-activemq</artifactId>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org