You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xindice-dev@xml.apache.org by sandy pittendrigh <sa...@cns.montana.edu> on 2004/08/24 22:21:32 UTC
Project status and current health
I'm curious about the current status of the Xindice project:
I don't see much activity on mail lists (users or dev) for
almost a month now.
Is Xindice still an active project?
Or should Xindice users start to consider porting their
codes to other alternatives (Exist, dbXML, Oracle, Ipedo, etc?)
--
/* Sandy Pittendrigh >--oO0>
** sandy@cns.montana.edu
** http://cns.montana.edu/~sandy
*/
Re: Project status and current health
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, sandy pittendrigh wrote:
> Our best developer (Todd Byrne) encountered an Xupdate bug
> a few weeks ago--that was a show stopper for us. Todd submitted
> a patch--that no one at Xindice has had time to address yet.
> That leaves us holding what amounts to our own custom
> branch of the Xindice codes. That too makes me a little nervous.
>
> Xindice is a great project. I hope for the best.
Xindece is owned by the Xindice community; of which you Sandy, and Todd
and all those others helping out are as much part as anyone else.
Though not ideal - it is not bad for a community to split/hand-off to one
group which maintains the older code and see a new group embark onto
something new. Either at the ASF or elsewhere.
And if you are very low on resources -and- you have developers giving you
good patches; consider adding a few committers quickly :-)
Dw
Re: Project status and current health
Posted by sandy pittendrigh <sa...@cns.montana.edu>.
RE> "I'm curious, why would you start porting?"
We're grateful for the great work (Xindice) that has already been done.
We've spent two years developing a (scientific data, domain specific) front
end to Xindice. It makes us feel a little nervous to have all our eggs in
one (at least temporarily) stalled basket.
Our best developer (Todd Byrne) encountered an Xupdate bug
a few weeks ago--that was a show stopper for us. Todd submitted
a patch--that no one at Xindice has had time to address yet.
That leaves us holding what amounts to our own custom
branch of the Xindice codes. That too makes me a little nervous.
Xindice is a great project. I hope for the best.
--
/* Sandy Pittendrigh >--oO0>
** sandy@cns.montana.edu
** http://cns.montana.edu/~sandy
*/
Re: Project status and current health
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>.
sandy pittendrigh wrote:
> I'm curious about the current status of the Xindice project:
> I don't see much activity on mail lists (users or dev) for
> almost a month now.
>
> Is Xindice still an active project?
Xindice currently lacks developers with time to contribute to it, but it
does not mean that it is dead.
> Or should Xindice users start to consider porting their
> codes to other alternatives (Exist, dbXML, Oracle, Ipedo, etc?)
I'm curious, why would you start porting?
Vadim