You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/03/27 17:27:05 UTC
[jira] [Created] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods
needed?
Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
---------------------------------------------
Key: NET-394
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394
Project: Commons Net
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Sebb
Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
As far as I can tell from reading the RFCs, clients always send tagged commands, it is only the server that can respond with untagged replies.
I think the methods should be removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods
needed?
Posted by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sebb resolved NET-394.
----------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NET-394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394
> Project: Commons Net
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> As far as I can tell from reading the RFCs, clients always send tagged commands, it is only the server that can respond with untagged replies.
> I think the methods should be removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods
needed?
Posted by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011857#comment-13011857 ]
Sebb commented on NET-394:
--------------------------
The AuthenticatingIMAPClient currently uses sendUntaggedCommand(String) to send the authentication data.
This is not a command, but data, so the method should be renamed.
Also, AFAICT there is no need for the other variants which take additional or different parameters.
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NET-394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394
> Project: Commons Net
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> As far as I can tell from reading the RFCs, clients always send tagged commands, it is only the server that can respond with untagged replies.
> I think the methods should be removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods
needed?
Posted by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sebb updated NET-394:
---------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NET-394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394
> Project: Commons Net
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sebb
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?
> As far as I can tell from reading the RFCs, clients always send tagged commands, it is only the server that can respond with untagged replies.
> I think the methods should be removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira