You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@apache.org> on 2003/03/21 17:43:32 UTC
FW: Poor documentation for jk
Not acked
------ Forwarded Message
> From: mark <mn...@ims400.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500
> To: webmaster@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Poor documentation for jk
>
> Hi Webmaster,
> I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the
> jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run
> scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk.
> jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would
> like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated
> documentation.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Mark Nye
>
>
>
------ End of Forwarded Message
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
> ------ Forwarded Message
>
>>From: mark <mn...@ims400.com>
>>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500
>>To: webmaster@jakarta.apache.org
>>Subject: Poor documentation for jk
>>
>>Hi Webmaster,
>>I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the
>>jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run
>>scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk.
There is up to date documentation for both jk and jk2 :
JK:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/doc/
JK2:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/
The documentation is regenerated each day from cvs contents.
Connector is also directly reference in tomcat 4.1 online doc :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
>>jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would
>>like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated
>>documentation.
Did you ever tried to search on user mailing lists ?
Sometimes I wonder why we make documentations....
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Hi,
The doc could be found at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Not acked
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
>
>>From: mark <mn...@ims400.com>
>>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500
>>To: webmaster@jakarta.apache.org
>>Subject: Poor documentation for jk
>>
>>Hi Webmaster,
>>I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the
>>jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run
>>scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk.
>>jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would
>>like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated
>>documentation.
>>
>>Thank you and best regards,
>>Mark Nye
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org