You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> on 2012/03/10 05:33:00 UTC
Commits to 0.94
I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues.
I would like to request to either:
o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
Thanks.
-- Lars
Re: Commits to 0.94
Posted by Dave Wang <ds...@cloudera.com>.
I think this idea is good as well.
- Dave
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us,
> we should be able to figure it out).
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > I think this is a great idea.
> >
> > Should we adopt this here?
> > I'm +1. Who else?
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
> >
> > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
> > vs. Targeted branch versions?
> >
> > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were
> marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as
> fixed.
> >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at
> through the jira issues.
> >>
> >> I would like to request to either:
> >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
> >>
> >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
> >>
> >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to
> 0.94)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> -- Lars
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harsh J
>
Re: Commits to 0.94
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us,
we should be able to figure it out).
St.Ack
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think this is a great idea.
>
> Should we adopt this here?
> I'm +1. Who else?
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
>
> Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
> vs. Targeted branch versions?
>
> Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
>> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues.
>>
>> I would like to request to either:
>> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
>>
>> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
>>
>> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
Re: Commits to 0.94
Posted by Joey Echeverria <jo...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:29 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think this is a great idea.
>
> Should we adopt this here?
> I'm +1. Who else?
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
>
> Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
> vs. Targeted branch versions?
>
> Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
>> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues.
>>
>> I would like to request to either:
>> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
>>
>> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
>>
>> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
--
Joseph Echeverria
Cloudera, Inc.
443.305.9434
Re: Commits to 0.94
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
I think this is a great idea.
Should we adopt this here?
I'm +1. Who else?
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
vs. Targeted branch versions?
Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues.
>
> I would like to request to either:
> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
>
> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
>
> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars
>
--
Harsh J
Re: Commits to 0.94
Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
vs. Targeted branch versions?
Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues.
>
> I would like to request to either:
> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
>
> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
>
> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars
>
--
Harsh J