You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Paul King (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/22 04:47:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7996) Using with method with a
closure that references a protected property produces ClassCastException
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16748379#comment-16748379 ]
Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7996 at 1/22/19 4:46 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed PR merged. Workaround is to use `owner.bar.isEmpty()` orĀ `this.bar.isEmpty()`
was (Author: paulk):
Proposed PR merged.
> Using with method with a closure that references a protected property produces ClassCastException
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-7996
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7996
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.4.7
> Reporter: Graeme Rocher
> Assignee: Paul King
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.5.6, 3.0.0-alpha-5
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The following example:
> {code}
> class Foo {
> Object propertyMissing(String name) {
> return "stuff"
> }
>
> void build(Closure callable) {
> this.with(callable)
> }
> }
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class Bar {
> protected List bar = []
>
> boolean doStuff() {
> Foo foo = new Foo()
> foo.build {
> return bar.isEmpty()
> }
> }
> }
> new Bar().doStuff()
> {code}
> Produces
> {code}
> java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String cannot be cast to java.util.List
> at Bar$_doStuff_closure1.doCall(ConsoleScript3:19)
> at Bar$_doStuff_closure1.call(ConsoleScript3)
> at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.with(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:242)
> at Bar.doStuff(ConsoleScript3:18)
> at Ba
> {code}
> The equivalent code without CompileStatic prints:
> {code}
> Result: false
> {code}
> The behaviour of both should be he same IMO
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)