You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Nathan Neulinger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/18 04:26:04 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6255) Misleading error message when usable
questionable update syntax
Nathan Neulinger created SOLR-6255:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Misleading error message when usable questionable update syntax
Key: SOLR-6255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6255
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: query parsers
Environment: 4.8.0, Linux x86_64, jdk 1.7.55, 2 x Node, External ZK, SolrCloud
Reporter: Nathan Neulinger
When issuing an update with the following questionable JSON as input, it returns (for the attached schema) an error that the required 'timestamp' field is missing.
[ { "id":"4b2c4d09-31e2-4fe2-b767-3868efbdcda1",
"channel": {"add": "preet"},
"channel": {"add": "adam"} }
]
Everything I've found so far indicates that in JSON this technically appears to be allowed, but there isn't any consistency in how any particular library might interpret it.
Using the more obviously correct format works without error.
[ { "id":"4b2c4d09-31e2-4fe2-b767-3868efbdcda1",
"channel": {"add": "preet"} },
{ "id":"4b2c4d09-31e2-4fe2-b767-3868efbdcda1",
"channel": {"add": "adam"} }
]
Full schema attached, but the following are the only required fields:
<field name="id" type="string" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" />
<field name="hive" type="string" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" />
<field name="at" type="date" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="true" />
<field name="timestamp" type="long" indexed="false"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="true" />
<field name="type" type="text_ws" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="true"/>
<field name="message_id" type="string" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="true" />
Channel field:
<field name="channel" type="text_ws" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="false" multiValued="true" omitNorms="true"/>
When I have a bit, I will try to reproduce with a minimally representative schema, but hopefully you can determine the reason it's parsing the way it is and have it generate a better error.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org