You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by "Merrill, Matt" <mm...@mitre.org> on 2014/08/20 18:45:56 UTC
Shindig 2.5.0-update1 usage
Hi all,
Is anyone running Shindig version 2.5.0-update1 in a production environment? We recently upgraded to this version from Shindig 2.0.0 and as indicated by my previous emails to the shindig dev list, we are having a number of performance issues.
I’m wondering if anyone else is using it what the experience has been.
Thanks!
-Matt
Re: Shindig 2.5.0-update1 usage
Posted by "Merrill, Matt" <mm...@mitre.org>.
Yes, we¹re using some utility classes from Rave version 0.23 and to be in
line with that we¹re running 2.5.0-update1 of shindig.
And just curious, what kind of usage does your prod instance get?
We¹ve got approximately 8000 users with on average about 10-12 gadgets
being rendered per page load, so it¹s a pretty decent load hitting shindig.
Thanks!
-Matt
On 8/20/14, 4:17 PM, "Stanton Sievers" <ss...@apache.org> wrote:
>Apache Rave is currently on the 2.5.0-update1 version of Shindig. I've
>been running Rave with OpenSocial gadgets and have not noticed any
>performance problems.
>
>Regards,
>-Stanton
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone running Shindig version 2.5.0-update1 in a production
>> environment? We recently upgraded to this version from Shindig 2.0.0
>>and
>> as indicated by my previous emails to the shindig dev list, we are
>>having a
>> number of performance issues.
>>
>> I¹m wondering if anyone else is using it what the experience has been.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Matt
>>
Re: Shindig 2.5.0-update1 usage
Posted by "Merrill, Matt" <mm...@mitre.org>.
Yes, we¹re using some utility classes from Rave version 0.23 and to be in
line with that we¹re running 2.5.0-update1 of shindig.
And just curious, what kind of usage does your prod instance get?
We¹ve got approximately 8000 users with on average about 10-12 gadgets
being rendered per page load, so it¹s a pretty decent load hitting shindig.
Thanks!
-Matt
On 8/20/14, 4:17 PM, "Stanton Sievers" <ss...@apache.org> wrote:
>Apache Rave is currently on the 2.5.0-update1 version of Shindig. I've
>been running Rave with OpenSocial gadgets and have not noticed any
>performance problems.
>
>Regards,
>-Stanton
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone running Shindig version 2.5.0-update1 in a production
>> environment? We recently upgraded to this version from Shindig 2.0.0
>>and
>> as indicated by my previous emails to the shindig dev list, we are
>>having a
>> number of performance issues.
>>
>> I¹m wondering if anyone else is using it what the experience has been.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Matt
>>
Re: Shindig 2.5.0-update1 usage
Posted by Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org>.
Apache Rave is currently on the 2.5.0-update1 version of Shindig. I've
been running Rave with OpenSocial gadgets and have not noticed any
performance problems.
Regards,
-Stanton
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone running Shindig version 2.5.0-update1 in a production
> environment? We recently upgraded to this version from Shindig 2.0.0 and
> as indicated by my previous emails to the shindig dev list, we are having a
> number of performance issues.
>
> I’m wondering if anyone else is using it what the experience has been.
>
> Thanks!
> -Matt
>
Re: Shindig 2.5.0-update1 usage
Posted by Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org>.
Apache Rave is currently on the 2.5.0-update1 version of Shindig. I've
been running Rave with OpenSocial gadgets and have not noticed any
performance problems.
Regards,
-Stanton
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone running Shindig version 2.5.0-update1 in a production
> environment? We recently upgraded to this version from Shindig 2.0.0 and
> as indicated by my previous emails to the shindig dev list, we are having a
> number of performance issues.
>
> I’m wondering if anyone else is using it what the experience has been.
>
> Thanks!
> -Matt
>