You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com> on 2024/11/30 15:47:20 UTC
[QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Hi everyone
I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2 unreleased
versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and 1.19.3).
Is that an expected behavior?
Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
--
Best regards,
Sergey
Re: [QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Posted by Alexander Fedulov <al...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Matthias, no problem!
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 12:53, Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, you're right. The Jira versions would be valid in that case.
>
> When I checked on Dec 2, it looked like the discussions on the releases for
> 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 were still going on and were not concluded. That's why I
> removed the versions. Sorry if I misunderstood the state of the releases
> preparations.
>
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 1:47 PM Alexander Fedulov <
> alexander.fedulov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sergey and Matthias,
> >
> > I am currently working on 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 releases and the new versions
> > were created in accordance to the release guidelines:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release
> > :
> >
> > Create a new version in JIRA:
> > > With the release currently underway, new issues should be resolved
> > against
> > > a subsequent future release. Therefore, you should create a release
> item
> > > for this subsequent release
> >
> >
> > I think such a state is expected while we are working on the RC and it
> > makes it possible to clearly see that none of the items that can/are
> > supposed to be fixed in the currently-baked version get left out.
> >
> > Best,
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 21:12, Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Matthias
> > >
> > > confirm, now there is only one unreleased version for 1.19 and one for
> > 1.20
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:17 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for bringing this up, Sergey. You're right.
> > > >
> > > > I went over the issues that had these versions assigned, assigned
> them
> > to
> > > > the right patch versions and deleted the versions 1.19.3 and 1.20.2
> so
> > > that
> > > > contributors don't accidentally assign new Jira issues to those
> > versions
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:47 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyanzin@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone
> > > > >
> > > > > I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
> > > > > and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2
> unreleased
> > > > > versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and
> > > 1.19.3).
> > > > > Is that an expected behavior?
> > > > > Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
> > > > > IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Sergey
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sergey
> > >
> >
>
Re: [QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Posted by Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>.
Yes, you're right. The Jira versions would be valid in that case.
When I checked on Dec 2, it looked like the discussions on the releases for
1.20.1 and 1.19.2 were still going on and were not concluded. That's why I
removed the versions. Sorry if I misunderstood the state of the releases
preparations.
Matthias
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 1:47 PM Alexander Fedulov <
alexander.fedulov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sergey and Matthias,
>
> I am currently working on 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 releases and the new versions
> were created in accordance to the release guidelines:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release
> :
>
> Create a new version in JIRA:
> > With the release currently underway, new issues should be resolved
> against
> > a subsequent future release. Therefore, you should create a release item
> > for this subsequent release
>
>
> I think such a state is expected while we are working on the RC and it
> makes it possible to clearly see that none of the items that can/are
> supposed to be fixed in the currently-baked version get left out.
>
> Best,
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 21:12, Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Matthias
> >
> > confirm, now there is only one unreleased version for 1.19 and one for
> 1.20
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:17 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for bringing this up, Sergey. You're right.
> > >
> > > I went over the issues that had these versions assigned, assigned them
> to
> > > the right patch versions and deleted the versions 1.19.3 and 1.20.2 so
> > that
> > > contributors don't accidentally assign new Jira issues to those
> versions
> > > again.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:47 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone
> > > >
> > > > I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
> > > > and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2 unreleased
> > > > versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and
> > 1.19.3).
> > > > Is that an expected behavior?
> > > > Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
> > > > IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Sergey
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Sergey
> >
>
Re: [QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Posted by Alexander Fedulov <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sergey and Matthias,
I am currently working on 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 releases and the new versions
were created in accordance to the release guidelines:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release:
Create a new version in JIRA:
> With the release currently underway, new issues should be resolved against
> a subsequent future release. Therefore, you should create a release item
> for this subsequent release
I think such a state is expected while we are working on the RC and it
makes it possible to clearly see that none of the items that can/are
supposed to be fixed in the currently-baked version get left out.
Best,
Alex
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 21:12, Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Matthias
>
> confirm, now there is only one unreleased version for 1.19 and one for 1.20
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:17 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing this up, Sergey. You're right.
> >
> > I went over the issues that had these versions assigned, assigned them to
> > the right patch versions and deleted the versions 1.19.3 and 1.20.2 so
> that
> > contributors don't accidentally assign new Jira issues to those versions
> > again.
> >
> > Best,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:47 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
> > > and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2 unreleased
> > > versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and
> 1.19.3).
> > > Is that an expected behavior?
> > > Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
> > > IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sergey
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>
Re: [QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Posted by Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Matthias
confirm, now there is only one unreleased version for 1.19 and one for 1.20
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:17 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up, Sergey. You're right.
>
> I went over the issues that had these versions assigned, assigned them to
> the right patch versions and deleted the versions 1.19.3 and 1.20.2 so that
> contributors don't accidentally assign new Jira issues to those versions
> again.
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:47 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
> > and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2 unreleased
> > versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and 1.19.3).
> > Is that an expected behavior?
> > Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
> > IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Sergey
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Sergey
Re: [QUESTION] Several unreleased 1.20.x and and 1.19.x versions in jira
Posted by Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>.
Thanks for bringing this up, Sergey. You're right.
I went over the issues that had these versions assigned, assigned them to
the right patch versions and deleted the versions 1.19.3 and 1.20.2 so that
contributors don't accidentally assign new Jira issues to those versions
again.
Best,
Matthias
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:47 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I have merged a couple of backports to 1.20
> and while logging this in jira I noticed that there are 2 unreleased
> versions for 1.20 (1.20.1, 1.20.2) and two for 1.19 (1.19.2 and 1.19.3).
> Is that an expected behavior?
> Also a question: what version should be picked for backported PRs ?
> IIUC 1.20.1 and 1.19.2 have not been released yet...
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>