.NET 2.0

[Kian Torabli <ki...@hotmail.com>]

To all those who asked about log4net availability on the .NET Framework 
2.0: it was easy enough to compile it, took me less than two hours to 
adapt the code and test it.

If you do not want to do the same chore yourself, I'll be happy to 
provide the updated sources, just drop me an e-mail.

IMPORTANT note: It will work for the Full Framework 2.0, not the Compact 
Framework, which I do not work with.

To you guys from Apache: I am quite dissatisfied, to say the least, with 
your handling of log4net. Since you took over from sourceforge, there 
were no more final releases and as you can see from the many requests 
for 2.0, you do not seem to (be able to?) keep up to the required speed 
at all. Why not give this useful gadget back to the developer community?

- Kian

Re: .NET 2.0

[Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>]

You can view the latest log4net files here:

 http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging/log4net/trunk/

or you can point your SVN client (Tortoise SVN is very popular on
Windows):

 http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/

to the log4net repository:

 http://svn.apache.org/logging/log4net/trunk/

--- LadyShug <sh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Great... I've been having issues during the conversion process when
> trying to
> open the log4net project with visual studio 2005 (.net 2.0)
> 
> could you please forward me the source you used 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: .NET 2.0

[LadyShug <sh...@yahoo.com>]

Great... I've been having issues during the conversion process when trying to
open the log4net project with visual studio 2005 (.net 2.0)

could you please forward me the source you used 

Re: .NET 2.0

[Hollywood <ho...@thzero.com>]

a) Its the same people.  Nicko's been leading it as long as I remember.
b) Even if its at Apache, its still available to the "developer community".
c) If you've already gone through the work of running the .NET 2.0 
solution/project convertor and have cleaned up the 120 or so warnings, then 
why not see the http://logging.apache.org/log4net/contributing.html and 
contribute a patch back to Apache for inclusion.   That way you are 
participating in the "developer community".

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kian Torabli" <ki...@hotmail.com>
To: <lo...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:47 AM
Subject: .NET 2.0


> To all those who asked about log4net availability on the .NET Framework 
> 2.0: it was easy enough to compile it, took me less than two hours to 
> adapt the code and test it.
>
> If you do not want to do the same chore yourself, I'll be happy to provide 
> the updated sources, just drop me an e-mail.
>
> IMPORTANT note: It will work for the Full Framework 2.0, not the Compact 
> Framework, which I do not work with.
>
> To you guys from Apache: I am quite dissatisfied, to say the least, with 
> your handling of log4net. Since you took over from sourceforge, there were 
> no more final releases and as you can see from the many requests for 2.0, 
> you do not seem to (be able to?) keep up to the required speed at all. Why 
> not give this useful gadget back to the developer community?
>
> - Kian
> 

Re: .NET 2.0

[Florian Brunner <fb...@gmx.ch>]

Hi Kian,

thanks for the source. 

I want to use the logger in a productive environment. I see 3 interesting
versions: 

incubating-log4net-1.2.9-beta.zip (on Apache site)

1.2.0 Beta8 (on Sourceforge site)

1.1.1 (on Sourceforge site; not beta)

I know that there's no stable version out there. But which version is best
for a productive environment? On which version is your .NET 2.0 version
based? Is it ready to use it in a productive environment?

As I mentioned before, I also need a .NET Compact Framework 2.0 version. Was
it straightforward to fix it for the (full) 2.0 version? Or were there some
tricky steps?

-Florian

> --- Kian Torabli <ki...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > To all those who asked about log4net availability on the .NET
> > Framework 
> > 2.0: it was easy enough to compile it, took me less than two hours to
> > 
> > adapt the code and test it.
> > 
> > If you do not want to do the same chore yourself, I'll be happy to 
> > provide the updated sources, just drop me an e-mail.
> > 
> > IMPORTANT note: It will work for the Full Framework 2.0, not the
> > Compact 
> > Framework, which I do not work with.
> > 
> > To you guys from Apache: I am quite dissatisfied, to say the least,
> > with 
> > your handling of log4net. Since you took over from sourceforge, there
> > 
> > were no more final releases and as you can see from the many requests
> > 
> > for 2.0, you do not seem to (be able to?) keep up to the required
> > speed 
> > at all. Why not give this useful gadget back to the developer
> > community?
> > 
> > - Kian
> > 
> 

-- 
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen f�r GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner

Re: .NET 2.0

[Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>]

Kian,

A lot of people (especially those who work for large companies) have
not made the switch to .NET 2.0 yet. At my company we've just started
discussions about putting .NET on some of our virtual machines. It will
be quite some time (several months) before its deployed company wide.

I glanced at the change log on for the log4net folder and saw that
people started commited changes for .NET 2.0 in November. It hasn't
been ignored. Its my understanding that the code in SVN compiles with
little or no warnings under .NET 2.0. 

Instead of criticizing the volunteers who work on log4net in their free
time, perhaps you could post to the dev list and describe what still
needs to be fixed in order for the source in SVN to compile under .NET
2.0 without warnings. Better yet, write some patches to help close some
JIRA issues.

--- Kian Torabli <ki...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> To all those who asked about log4net availability on the .NET
> Framework 
> 2.0: it was easy enough to compile it, took me less than two hours to
> 
> adapt the code and test it.
> 
> If you do not want to do the same chore yourself, I'll be happy to 
> provide the updated sources, just drop me an e-mail.
> 
> IMPORTANT note: It will work for the Full Framework 2.0, not the
> Compact 
> Framework, which I do not work with.
> 
> To you guys from Apache: I am quite dissatisfied, to say the least,
> with 
> your handling of log4net. Since you took over from sourceforge, there
> 
> were no more final releases and as you can see from the many requests
> 
> for 2.0, you do not seem to (be able to?) keep up to the required
> speed 
> at all. Why not give this useful gadget back to the developer
> community?
> 
> - Kian
>