You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Florin Iucha <fl...@iucha.net> on 2003/09/27 04:30:48 UTC
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika, Florin, Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:52:38PM -0400, Files wrote:
> *******************************************************
> Florin
> *******************************************************
>
> JDK 1.4.3 is out - has been for a month or more. :) You should get it.
> Latest mozilla requires it. :-)
[snip]
> Florin, the latest jdk is out - 1.4.3 - get it. :)
Sun's website shows JDK 1.4.2 as "NEW". Could you please post an URL
to download JDK 1.4.3?
florin
--
Don't question authority: they don't know either!
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika, Florin,
Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by Patrick Mayweg <ma...@qint.de>.
Hi Branko,
Branko Čibej wrote:
>Files wrote:
>
>
>
>>Oh, man. I've been staring at these numbers too long.
>>
>>I apologize.
>>
>>I have J2SDK1.4.2 final at home and J2SDK1.4.2 release 3 (J2SDK1.4.2_03)
>>at work.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Actually, you can't have that, either. :-) The latest release is
>1.4.2_01; you _could_ have 1.4.1_03, which was the last in the 1.4.1 series.
>
>
javahl needs only jdk 1.3 and should build with any 1.3 or 1.4 jdk.
There is nothing in there which need 1.4.
Regards,
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika, Florin,
Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Files wrote:
>Oh, man. I've been staring at these numbers too long.
>
>I apologize.
>
>I have J2SDK1.4.2 final at home and J2SDK1.4.2 release 3 (J2SDK1.4.2_03)
>at work.
>
>
Actually, you can't have that, either. :-) The latest release is
1.4.2_01; you _could_ have 1.4.1_03, which was the last in the 1.4.1 series.
--
Brane Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika,
Florin, Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by Files <fi...@poetryunlimited.com>.
Oh, man. I've been staring at these numbers too long.
I apologize.
I have J2SDK1.4.2 final at home and J2SDK1.4.2 release 3 (J2SDK1.4.2_03)
at work.
Ugh. So sorry. I was *so* sure it was 1.4.3. But then again, I should
have never drafted that message while I was still at work, without
checking the version numbers at home one more time.
I should have checked it again, instead of just cutting and pasting it.
You're absolutely right. J2SDK1.4.2 final is the latest release.
*sigh*
Please pass the caffeine and jolt please.
Again, I'm sorry.
Shamim Islam
BA BS
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 00:30, Florin Iucha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:52:38PM -0400, Files wrote:
> > *******************************************************
> > Florin
> > *******************************************************
> >
> > JDK 1.4.3 is out - has been for a month or more. :) You should get it.
> > Latest mozilla requires it. :-)
>
> [snip]
>
> > Florin, the latest jdk is out - 1.4.3 - get it. :)
>
> Sun's website shows JDK 1.4.2 as "NEW". Could you please post an URL
> to download JDK 1.4.3?
>
> florin
--
Shamim Islam
BA BS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl solved
Posted by Cédric Chabanois <cc...@ifrance.com>.
Yes good job !
I had myself to modify configure.in before making it work. So it seems
it was not necessary ...
Concerning subclipse, we actually support Eclipse 2.1.1 (but we may
choose soon to support Eclipse 3.0M3 if necessary)
javahl did not work with Eclipse 2.1.1 due to threading problems.
It seems to work with eclipse 3.0M3
Can someone test javahl (the one from McClain Looney) with eclipse 2.1.1
and subclipse 0.8 (mine) and tell me if it works for him ?
I hope too that javahl patch will get in this week-end.
Cédric
> Yahoo and congrats!
>
> So it worked with automake 1.6 without need to modify configure.in?
> Maybe we should write some addons/modifications to the javahl/INSTALL
> just in case that some another newbie will try to build it soon
> without first reading this thread. -:)
>
> Btw, there is finally an unofficial binary for the Linux subclipse
> plugin available in the
> http://www.loonsoft.com/downloads/svnplugin-8.0a-linux-bin.zip
>
> McClain Looney got it working yesterday. It will require eclipse 3 (I
> am testing it with eclipse 3 integration release from 25.9 2003)
>
> There is hope that both the javahl and subclipse patches will get in
> this weekend to the version control.
>
> Mika
>
> Files wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 03:19, lamikr_mdk wrote:
>>
>>> I have followed the development in the OS/2 and there automake and
>>> autoconf have often caused problems due to filesystem having drive
>>
>>
>>
>> automake1-6 was sufficient without straying from stock Mandrake 9.1
>> packages. :-)
>>
>> Thanks so much for your help. Now all I have to do is figure out what
>> files would normally get installed, where they would go, and create an
>> RPM to go with that.
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Envie de discuter en "live" avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger
> http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France
>
_____________________________________________________________________
Envie de discuter en "live" avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl solved
Posted by lamikr_mdk <la...@aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi>.
Yahoo and congrats!
So it worked with automake 1.6 without need to modify configure.in?
Maybe we should write some addons/modifications to the javahl/INSTALL
just in case that some another newbie will try to build it soon without
first reading this thread. -:)
Btw, there is finally an unofficial binary for the Linux subclipse
plugin available in the
http://www.loonsoft.com/downloads/svnplugin-8.0a-linux-bin.zip
McClain Looney got it working yesterday. It will require eclipse 3 (I am
testing it with eclipse 3 integration release from 25.9 2003)
There is hope that both the javahl and subclipse patches will get in
this weekend to the version control.
Mika
Files wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 03:19, lamikr_mdk wrote:
>
>>I have followed the development in the OS/2 and there automake and
>>autoconf have often caused problems due to filesystem having drive
>
>
> automake1-6 was sufficient without straying from stock Mandrake 9.1
> packages. :-)
>
> Thanks so much for your help. Now all I have to do is figure out what
> files would normally get installed, where they would go, and create an
> RPM to go with that.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl solved
Posted by Files <fi...@poetryunlimited.com>.
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 03:19, lamikr_mdk wrote:
> I have followed the development in the OS/2 and there automake and
> autoconf have often caused problems due to filesystem having drive
automake1-6 was sufficient without straying from stock Mandrake 9.1
packages. :-)
Thanks so much for your help. Now all I have to do is figure out what
files would normally get installed, where they would go, and create an
RPM to go with that.
I'll get to that after Wednesday this week.
On another note, I have 0.30.0 compiling clean, as well as the trunk for
Mandrake RPMs.
Now, I just have to figure out what the log message should say. The
number of files in that little packaging directory have grown
significanly, if only in the interests of allowing people to use the
contents to compile 0.29.0 as well as 0.30.0 as well as the trunk with
the same toolset. lol I must be a glutton for punishment.
Later.
--
Shamim Islam
BA BS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika, Florin,
Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by lamikr_mdk <la...@aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi>.
I have followed the development in the OS/2 and there automake and
autoconf have often caused problems due to filesystem having drive
letters and not having symbolic links. I thought that after running
Linux I will not have these problems anymore but I forget the versioning
problem. :-(
Anyway if you want to build javahl with the older distro than I have
then I believe that you really must to modify configure in. Basic things
that makefiles should do are in my understanding following.
Build all java-files from the src directory.
Produce h.files from the java-classes for the native c-part.
Build c-files from the native-directory
Link c-files together
jar all java classes to single jar.
Mika
Florin Iucha wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:11:10AM -0400, Files wrote:
>
>>In the meantime, do you have any knowledge of the internal workings of
>>automake and the like?
>
>
> Urrgh... no! I tried approaching them and I saw people running scared :)
>
> florin
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika, Florin, Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by Florin Iucha <fl...@iucha.net>.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:11:10AM -0400, Files wrote:
> In the meantime, do you have any knowledge of the internal workings of
> automake and the like?
Urrgh... no! I tried approaching them and I saw people running scared :)
florin
--
Don't question authority: they don't know either!
Re: javahl building woes for Mandrake RPM generation [For Mika,
Florin, Patrick - or anyone else if interested]
Posted by Files <fi...@poetryunlimited.com>.
In the meantime, do you have any knowledge of the internal workings of
automake and the like?
Thanks.
> --
> Shamim Islam
> BA BS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org