Java 8 for AntUnit

[Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>]

Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?

Matt

Re: Java 8 for AntUnit

[Gintautas Grigelionis <g....@gmail.com>]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 21:50, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:

> Okay to stick with Java 5 for now, for the 1.9.x reason.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>

Can JUnit 3 be removed? I believe JUnit 4 has Java 5 as a baseline.

Gintas

Re: Java 8 for AntUnit

[Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>]

Okay to stick with Java 5 for now, for the 1.9.x reason.

Thanks,
Matt

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022, 9:09 AM Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we
> should
> > continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
>
> We still create Ant 1.9.x releases from time to time and 1.9.x would not
> be able to use newer releases. Having said that, it is not as if we had
> much active development of AntUnit, so it wouldn't miss out much.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

Re: Java 8 for AntUnit

[Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>]

On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:

> Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
> continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?

We still create Ant 1.9.x releases from time to time and 1.9.x would not
be able to use newer releases. Having said that, it is not as if we had
much active development of AntUnit, so it wouldn't miss out much.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org