You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by dr...@apache.org on 2018/03/03 14:31:14 UTC

svn commit: r1825771 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Author: druggeri
Date: Sat Mar  3 14:31:14 2018
New Revision: 1825771

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1825771&view=rev
Log:
*) mod_proxy_fcgi: Add the support for the mod_proxy's flushpackets parameter.
  trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1802040
               http://svn.apache.org/r1807876
               http://svn.apache.org/r1808014
               http://svn.apache.org/r1805490
               http://svn.apache.org/r1823886
  2.4.x: svn merge -c 1802040,1807876,1808014,1805490,1823886 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
  +1: elukey, jim, ylavic
  elukey: this patch has been requested a couple of times in the users@ mailing list,
          but from my tests in trunk the async/set-aside core features would already
          do the job without the need of this patch. I am proposing the backport
          to allow more users to migrate away from mod_fastcgi.


Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1825771&r1=1825770&r2=1825771&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sat Mar  3 14:31:14 2018
@@ -119,19 +119,6 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
 
-  *) mod_proxy_fcgi: Add the support for the mod_proxy's flushpackets parameter.
-    trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1802040
-                 http://svn.apache.org/r1807876
-                 http://svn.apache.org/r1808014
-                 http://svn.apache.org/r1805490
-                 http://svn.apache.org/r1823886
-    2.4.x: svn merge -c 1802040,1807876,1808014,1805490,1823886 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
-    +1: elukey, jim, ylavic
-    elukey: this patch has been requested a couple of times in the users@ mailing list,
-            but from my tests in trunk the async/set-aside core features would already
-            do the job without the need of this patch. I am proposing the backport
-            to allow more users to migrate away from mod_fastcgi.
-
 
 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]