You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> on 2007/02/06 03:52:56 UTC

JIRA issue types

Hi,

Does anyone understand what the difference is between an "Improvement"
and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict superset
of "New Feature".

Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use "New
Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things that will
need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things that just
need tweaks in code?

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

Re: JIRA issue types

Posted by William Cai <wc...@xwarelabs.com>.
Based on my limited experience, I'd say "Improvement" is an "enhancement" of
existing feature, and "New Feature" is new feature. :-) Most project/bug
track systems use both of them. However, there is not strict difference
between them, an Enhancement sometime looks like a new feature. And a new
feature can be treated as an enhancement as well.

On 2/6/07, Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone understand what the difference is between an "Improvement"
> and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict superset
> of "New Feature".
>
> Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
> functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use "New
> Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things that will
> need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things that just
> need tweaks in code?
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>

Re: JIRA issue types

Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
I don't know the official difference, but I would guess that an  
"improvement" is a request like "better error message when a rollback  
fails", vs. "new feature", which seems like a bigger additional to  
the code.



On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does anyone understand what the difference is between an "Improvement"
> and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict  
> superset
> of "New Feature".
>
> Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
> functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use  
> "New
> Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things that will
> need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things that just
> need tweaks in code?
>
> -Patrick
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.


Re: JIRA issue types

Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:07 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:

> I'd agree with this assessment.  New Features are bigger pieces of  
> work --
> more design, documentation, marketing, etc.  Improvements are  
> smaller bits
> of work.  Still may need some documentation tweaks, but these type of
> changes would not make a big splash with marketing.

+1

Craig
>
> On 2/5/07, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>
>> I like to reserve New Feature to high level new stuff that should be
>> marketed.  Normally, I like to break these down into bite-sized sub
>> tasks.  Most other changes are bug fixes or iterative improvements to
>> the code base.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Does anyone understand what the difference is between an  
>> "Improvement"
>> > and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict
>> > superset
>> > of "New Feature".
>> >
>> > Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
>> > functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use
>> > "New
>> > Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things  
>> that will
>> > need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things  
>> that just
>> > need tweaks in code?
>> >
>> > -Patrick
>> >
>> > --
>> > Patrick Linskey
>> > BEA Systems, Inc.
>> >
>> >  
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _
>> > _
>> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
>> > contain
>> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
>> > affiliated
>> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
>> > and/or
>> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
>> > individual
>> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
>> > recipient,
>> > and have received this message in error, please immediately return
>> > this
>> > by email and then delete it.
>>
>>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Re: JIRA issue types

Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
I'd agree with this assessment.  New Features are bigger pieces of work --
more design, documentation, marketing, etc.  Improvements are smaller bits
of work.  Still may need some documentation tweaks, but these type of
changes would not make a big splash with marketing.

On 2/5/07, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>
> I like to reserve New Feature to high level new stuff that should be
> marketed.  Normally, I like to break these down into bite-sized sub
> tasks.  Most other changes are bug fixes or iterative improvements to
> the code base.
>
> -dain
>
> On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone understand what the difference is between an "Improvement"
> > and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict
> > superset
> > of "New Feature".
> >
> > Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
> > functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use
> > "New
> > Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things that will
> > need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things that just
> > need tweaks in code?
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> > contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> > and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> > individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > and have received this message in error, please immediately return
> > this
> > by email and then delete it.
>
>

Re: JIRA issue types

Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I like to reserve New Feature to high level new stuff that should be  
marketed.  Normally, I like to break these down into bite-sized sub  
tasks.  Most other changes are bug fixes or iterative improvements to  
the code base.

-dain

On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does anyone understand what the difference is between an "Improvement"
> and a "New Feature"? My hope is that "Improvement" is a strict  
> superset
> of "New Feature".
>
> Should we strive to use "Improvement" rarely, only for bits of
> functionality that exist but need to be nominally tweaked, and use  
> "New
> Feature" for other things? Maybe "New Feature" is for things that will
> need mentioning in docs etc, and "Improvement" is for things that just
> need tweaks in code?
>
> -Patrick
>
> -- 
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.