You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/01/23 21:05:56 UTC
[VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Hi,
Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
- fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
- making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
- changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
- misc updates
-----------
If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
The list of changes in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
<http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
The SVN tags are here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
and for the Eclipse Update Site:
http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
<http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
found that Jiras https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5273 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5208 were incorrectly marked as fixed
in 3.0.0-alpha. Changed the Jira to 3.0.0-beta.
This means these two issues show up as "fixed" in issues-fixed, but they are not
included... I don't consider this a blocking issue to the release, given its
alpha status.
-Marshall
On 1/23/2017 5:08 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Testing: 3.0.0-alpha rc4
>
> signatures: ok
>
> compare svn tag with source-release: OK
>
> issues-fixed - OK
>
> LICENSE / NOTICE: no change from previous
> 3 new 3rd party components in bin distr, all already covered under Apache v2
> license, no notices
>
> build from sources - OK
>
> in unzipped binary: ran adjust example paths, and doc analyzer. looked at
> results in Java results viewer - OK
>
> install into newly-unzipped Eclipse Neon.2, and run component descriptor editor
> and jcasgen - OK
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Testing: 3.0.0-alpha rc4
signatures: ok
compare svn tag with source-release: OK
issues-fixed - OK
LICENSE / NOTICE: no change from previous
3 new 3rd party components in bin distr, all already covered under Apache v2
license, no notices
build from sources - OK
in unzipped binary: ran adjust example paths, and doc analyzer. looked at
results in Java results viewer - OK
install into newly-unzipped Eclipse Neon.2, and run component descriptor editor
and jcasgen - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
-Marshall Schor
[VOTE] [RESULT] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received.
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Peter Kl�gl
+1 J�rn Kottmann
Thanks for voting!
-Marshall
On 1/23/2017 4:05 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
> - misc updates
> -----------
>
> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>
> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>
> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
+1 good idea. I'll post a Jira...
-M
On 2/3/2017 9:01 AM, Peter Klgl wrote:
> +1 Good idea.
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 03.02.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>> We'd need to have a separate update site for alphas/milestones/etc.
>>
>> -- Richard
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
+1 Good idea.
Peter
Am 03.02.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>
> We'd need to have a separate update site for alphas/milestones/etc.
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
On 02.02.2017, at 15:50, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, there's a check box that says to show all available versions.
>
> I googled to see if could be "set" by the update site somehow, found out that
> Eclipse help says it's checked by default; so I don't think this can be fixed.
> I posted a note about this to uima-user.
We'd need to have a separate update site for alphas/milestones/etc.
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Yes, there's a check box that says to show all available versions.
I googled to see if could be "set" by the update site somehow, found out that
Eclipse help says it's checked by default; so I don't think this can be fixed.
I posted a note about this to uima-user.
-M
On 2/1/2017 5:53 AM, Peter Klgl wrote:
> When installing the features in Eclipse with the initial set checkboxes,
> only the 3.0.0.alpha release is visible. Could happen that someone not
> checking the versions installs the alpha release by accident.
>
>
> Just wanted to mention it. This is a bit suboptimal but I also do not
> know any improvement.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 01.02.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>>> On 30.01.2017, at 15:39, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/30/2017 8:24 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>>>> +1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from
>>>> our community.
>>>>
>>>> The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha
>>>> version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version
>>>> frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed).
>>> good idea. Do you mean things like 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2, etc. ? or do you
>>> have a better naming convention in mind?
>> Applause for the first v3 alpha release! I hope being able to play with it
>> in the not so far away future... unfortunately, the start of this year is
>> unusually busy for me.
>>
>> I think "3.0.0-alpha-1", "3.0.0-alpha-2" are pretty good until we eventually
>> switch to 3.0.0-beta-1" and finally to "3.0.0" ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Richard
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
When installing the features in Eclipse with the initial set checkboxes,
only the 3.0.0.alpha release is visible. Could happen that someone not
checking the versions installs the alpha release by accident.
Just wanted to mention it. This is a bit suboptimal but I also do not
know any improvement.
Peter
Am 01.02.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>> On 30.01.2017, at 15:39, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/30/2017 8:24 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>>> +1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from
>>> our community.
>>>
>>> The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha
>>> version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version
>>> frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed).
>> good idea. Do you mean things like 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2, etc. ? or do you
>> have a better naming convention in mind?
> Applause for the first v3 alpha release! I hope being able to play with it
> in the not so far away future... unfortunately, the start of this year is
> unusually busy for me.
>
> I think "3.0.0-alpha-1", "3.0.0-alpha-2" are pretty good until we eventually
> switch to 3.0.0-beta-1" and finally to "3.0.0" ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
> On 30.01.2017, at 15:39, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/30/2017 8:24 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>> +1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from
>> our community.
>>
>> The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha
>> version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version
>> frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed).
> good idea. Do you mean things like 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2, etc. ? or do you
> have a better naming convention in mind?
Applause for the first v3 alpha release! I hope being able to play with it
in the not so far away future... unfortunately, the start of this year is
unusually busy for me.
I think "3.0.0-alpha-1", "3.0.0-alpha-2" are pretty good until we eventually
switch to 3.0.0-beta-1" and finally to "3.0.0" ;)
Cheers,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 1/30/2017 8:24 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> +1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from
> our community.
>
> The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha
> version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version
> frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed).
good idea. Do you mean things like 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2, etc. ? or do you
have a better naming convention in mind?
-M
> J�rn
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Peter Kl�gl <pe...@averbis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>
>> The html seems to be broken, maybe only by the "<\p>" instead of "</p>".
>>
>>
>> README mentions "UIMA-SDK version 3.0.0-alpha1" but RELEASE_NOTES
>> mentions "v3.0.0-alpha"
>>
>>
>> spot checked LICENSE/NOTICE files - OK
>>
>> spot checked sigs - looks ok, but failed. I had this problems already a
>> few times, no idea yet what causes it on my machine.
>>
>>
>> checked issues-fixed - found a diff (already reported my Marschall)
>>
>>
>> Several issues could be fixed in this RC but none is a blocker for me...
>>
>> [X] +1 OK to release
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 27.01.2017 um 11:38 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>>> installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
>>>
>>>
>>> The update site is actually
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-
>> alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
>>> Mind the uimaj at the end
>>>
>>> I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
>>> people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
>>> artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
>> space.
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>>>> First part of review
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
>>>> - the usuale diff
>>>> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
>>>> mvn clean install source-release - OK
>>>> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
>>>> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>>>>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>>>>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in,
>> for
>>>>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>>>>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>>>>> - misc updates
>>>>> -----------
>>>>>
>>>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes
>> other than
>>>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated
>> or
>>>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas
>> classes as
>>>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as
>> Eclipse
>>>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this
>> are in a new
>>>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) -
>> it's
>>>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>>>
>>>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of
>> this
>>>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm
>> happy to
>>>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>>>
>>>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged
>> to
>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-
>> candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>>>>
>>>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>>>>
>>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-
>> alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-
>> candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
+1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from
our community.
The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha
version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version
frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed).
Jörn
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
wrote:
> RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The html seems to be broken, maybe only by the "<\p>" instead of "</p>".
>
>
> README mentions "UIMA-SDK version 3.0.0-alpha1" but RELEASE_NOTES
> mentions "v3.0.0-alpha"
>
>
> spot checked LICENSE/NOTICE files - OK
>
> spot checked sigs - looks ok, but failed. I had this problems already a
> few times, no idea yet what causes it on my machine.
>
>
> checked issues-fixed - found a diff (already reported my Marschall)
>
>
> Several issues could be fixed in this RC but none is a blocker for me...
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 27.01.2017 um 11:38 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> > installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
> >
> >
> > The update site is actually
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-
> alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> >
> > Mind the uimaj at the end
> >
> > I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
> > people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
> > artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
> space.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >> First part of review
> >>
> >>
> >> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
> >> - the usuale diff
> >> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
> >> mvn clean install source-release - OK
> >> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
> >> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
> >>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
> >>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in,
> for
> >>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
> >>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
> >>> - misc updates
> >>> -----------
> >>>
> >>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes
> other than
> >>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated
> or
> >>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas
> classes as
> >>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
> >>>
> >>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as
> Eclipse
> >>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this
> are in a new
> >>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) -
> it's
> >>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
> >>>
> >>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of
> this
> >>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm
> happy to
> >>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
> >>>
> >>> The list of changes in Jira:
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
> >>>
> >>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged
> to
> >>>
> >>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
> >>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-
> candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
> >>>
> >>> The Maven artifacts are here:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
> >>>
> >>> The SVN tags are here:
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
> >>>
> >>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
> >>>
> >>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-
> alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
> >>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-
> candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> -Marshall
> >>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
RELEASE_NOTES.html
The html seems to be broken, maybe only by the "<\p>" instead of "</p>".
README mentions "UIMA-SDK version 3.0.0-alpha1" but RELEASE_NOTES
mentions "v3.0.0-alpha"
spot checked LICENSE/NOTICE files - OK
spot checked sigs - looks ok, but failed. I had this problems already a
few times, no idea yet what causes it on my machine.
checked issues-fixed - found a diff (already reported my Marschall)
Several issues could be fixed in this RC but none is a blocker for me...
[X] +1 OK to release
Peter
Am 27.01.2017 um 11:38 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
> installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
>
>
> The update site is actually
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
>
> Mind the uimaj at the end
>
> I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
> people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
> artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev space.
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>> First part of review
>>
>>
>> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
>> - the usuale diff
>> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
>> mvn clean install source-release - OK
>> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
>> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
>>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>>> - misc updates
>>> -----------
>>>
>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>
>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>
>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>
>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>
>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>>
>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>>
>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>>
>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
I did not want to imply a "must" :-)
Just wanted to mention it since I was recalling it when I saw your link.
(I naively hope that /dist is not a normal SVN instance but some special
binary storage with an svn interface)
Peter
Am 27.01.2017 um 17:17 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Hi,
>
> I found http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#host-rc
>
> which has a "should" (not a "must") for where to host release candidates.
>
> I'll switch my build process in the future to do this.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 1/27/2017 11:02 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Thanks for testing!
>>
>> By the way, I tried profiling the ruta-core test run to see why version 3 was so
>> much faster than version 2. I couldn't find an easy way to "loop" all the tests
>> (I'm surprised the Eclipse Junit support doesn't include something supporting
>> this!). So my observations are probably not very accurate. What I did see was
>> lots (double) time spent in things like "file exists", and others relating to
>> class loading. I'm thinking the root cause of the improvement is that Version 3
>> only tries to load 1 class per type, whereas version 2 deals with both XXX and
>> XXX_Type classes.
>>
>> So this performance delta is probably not "real" in terms of longer running
>> code, once getting past initialization... (But there probably is some
>> performance improvement, I hope!
>>
>> More below, inline.
>>
>> On 1/27/2017 5:38 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
>>> installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
>>>
>>>
>>> The update site is actually
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
>> Correct. - sorry!
>>
>>> Mind the uimaj at the end
>>>
>>> I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
>>> people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
>>> artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev space.
>> I'll take a look, but I don't remember anything specific, other than it was a
>> suggestion. I don't particularly like using SVN (never gets deleted) storage
>> for multiple release candidates - seems a waste...
>>
>> I'll look around for emails re: this topic.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>>>> First part of review
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
>>>> - the usuale diff
>>>> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
>>>> mvn clean install source-release - OK
>>>> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
>>>> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>>>>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>>>>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
>>>>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>>>>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>>>>> - misc updates
>>>>> -----------
>>>>>
>>>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>>>
>>>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>>>
>>>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>>>
>>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>>>
>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>>>>
>>>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>>>>
>>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi,
I found http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#host-rc
which has a "should" (not a "must") for where to host release candidates.
I'll switch my build process in the future to do this.
-Marshall
On 1/27/2017 11:02 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thanks for testing!
>
> By the way, I tried profiling the ruta-core test run to see why version 3 was so
> much faster than version 2. I couldn't find an easy way to "loop" all the tests
> (I'm surprised the Eclipse Junit support doesn't include something supporting
> this!). So my observations are probably not very accurate. What I did see was
> lots (double) time spent in things like "file exists", and others relating to
> class loading. I'm thinking the root cause of the improvement is that Version 3
> only tries to load 1 class per type, whereas version 2 deals with both XXX and
> XXX_Type classes.
>
> So this performance delta is probably not "real" in terms of longer running
> code, once getting past initialization... (But there probably is some
> performance improvement, I hope!
>
> More below, inline.
>
> On 1/27/2017 5:38 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
>> installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
>>
>>
>> The update site is actually
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
> Correct. - sorry!
>
>> Mind the uimaj at the end
>>
>> I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
>> people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
>> artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev space.
> I'll take a look, but I don't remember anything specific, other than it was a
> suggestion. I don't particularly like using SVN (never gets deleted) storage
> for multiple release candidates - seems a waste...
>
> I'll look around for emails re: this topic.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
>
>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>>> First part of review
>>>
>>>
>>> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
>>> - the usuale diff
>>> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
>>> mvn clean install source-release - OK
>>> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
>>> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>>>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>>>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
>>>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>>>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>>>> - misc updates
>>>> -----------
>>>>
>>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>>
>>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>>
>>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>>
>>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>>
>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>>
>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>>>
>>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>>>
>>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>>>
>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>>
>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Am 27.01.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Thanks for testing!
>
> By the way, I tried profiling the ruta-core test run to see why version 3 was so
> much faster than version 2. I couldn't find an easy way to "loop" all the tests
> (I'm surprised the Eclipse Junit support doesn't include something supporting
> this!). So my observations are probably not very accurate. What I did see was
> lots (double) time spent in things like "file exists", and others relating to
> class loading. I'm thinking the root cause of the improvement is that Version 3
> only tries to load 1 class per type, whereas version 2 deals with both XXX and
> XXX_Type classes.
>
> So this performance delta is probably not "real" in terms of longer running
> code, once getting past initialization... (But there probably is some
> performance improvement, I hope!
>
>
I will evaluate the peformance of ruta with v3 in some realistic use
cases since I am planning to optimize ruta anyways the next onths.
Peter
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thanks for testing!
By the way, I tried profiling the ruta-core test run to see why version 3 was so
much faster than version 2. I couldn't find an easy way to "loop" all the tests
(I'm surprised the Eclipse Junit support doesn't include something supporting
this!). So my observations are probably not very accurate. What I did see was
lots (double) time spent in things like "file exists", and others relating to
class loading. I'm thinking the root cause of the improvement is that Version 3
only tries to load 1 class per type, whereas version 2 deals with both XXX and
XXX_Type classes.
So this performance delta is probably not "real" in terms of longer running
code, once getting past initialization... (But there probably is some
performance improvement, I hope!
More below, inline.
On 1/27/2017 5:38 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
> installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
>
>
> The update site is actually
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
Correct. - sorry!
> Mind the uimaj at the end
>
> I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
> people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
> artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev space.
I'll take a look, but I don't remember anything specific, other than it was a
suggestion. I don't particularly like using SVN (never gets deleted) storage
for multiple release candidates - seems a waste...
I'll look around for emails re: this topic.
-Marshall
> Peter
>
>
> Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
>> First part of review
>>
>>
>> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
>> - the usuale diff
>> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
>> mvn clean install source-release - OK
>> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
>> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
>>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>>> - misc updates
>>> -----------
>>>
>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>
>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>
>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>
>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>
>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>>
>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>>
>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>>
>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
installed and tested update site in Eclipse Neon.2 - OK
The update site is actually
http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
Mind the uimaj at the end
I thought to remember that there was some mail when the migration from
people to home happened that we should not host release or staged
artefacts there but use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev space.
Peter
Am 27.01.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Peter Kl�gl:
> First part of review
>
>
> compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
> - the usuale diff
> mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
> mvn clean install source-release - OK
> built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
> - there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
>> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
>> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
>> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
>> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
>> - misc updates
>> -----------
>>
>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>
>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>
>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>
>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>
>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>>
>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>>
>> The SVN tags are here:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>>
>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
Re: [VOTE] uima-sdk 3.0.0-alpha rc4
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
First part of review
compared svn-tag with source-release - OK
- the usuale diff
mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
mvn clean install source-release - OK
built modified ruta with staged artefacts - OK
- there are several problems which need to be fixed on ruta's side
Peter
Am 23.01.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Hi,
>
> Here's RC4. The changes from RC3 are:
> - fixing hashcode impl in one of the new semi-built-ins
> - making the 3 new built-in types not built-in, but "semi" built-in, for
> better compatibility with V2 (including uimaC++)
> - changing the version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0-alpha
> - misc updates
> -----------
>
> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>
> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>
> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1119/
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-alpha/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc4/eclipse-update-site/>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>