You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> on 2016/11/15 11:42:24 UTC

jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

Hi!

I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for the
first time but you'll see some of them failing. As soon as the snapshots
are published to the snapshots repo they will go back to green.

I've also disabled our "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" build and configured the
more generic "jclouds-compat" to run every time a commit is made to master.
That build not only checks guava and guice, but also builds the project
with java 8 and uses a more complete matrix.


Regards!

I.

Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

Posted by Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:37:31AM -0500, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> Is there a plan to remove the "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" and Java 8
> builds entirely? Also, would it make sense to consider adding
> compatibility builds for Java 9?

jclouds is not yet compatible with JDK 9:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1101

We have issues with Google error-prone and auto, with the latter fixed
in their master branch.

-- 
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/

Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
I'd say both builds could be removed now :)

Regarding Java 9 builds, it would be great, but I think java 9 is not yet
available in CloudBees.

On 15 November 2016 at 15:37, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com> wrote:

> I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for the
>> first time but you'll see some of them failing. As soon as the snapshots
>> are published to the snapshots repo they will go back to green.
>>
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, Ignasi!
>
> I've also disabled our "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" build and configured the
>> more generic "jclouds-compat" to run every time a commit is made to
>> master.
>>
>
> Is there a plan to remove the "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" and Java 8
> builds entirely? Also, would it make sense to consider adding compatibility
> builds for Java 9?
>
> Regards
>
> ap
>

Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

Posted by Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>.
> I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for 
> the
> first time but you'll see some of them failing. As soon as the 
> snapshots
> are published to the snapshots repo they will go back to green.

Thanks for the heads-up, Ignasi!

> I've also disabled our "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" build and configured 
> the
> more generic "jclouds-compat" to run every time a commit is made to 
> master.

Is there a plan to remove the "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" and Java 8 
builds entirely? Also, would it make sense to consider adding 
compatibility builds for Java 9?

Regards

ap