You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-java@ibatis.apache.org by georgj14 <ge...@nationwide.com> on 2008/01/18 18:36:06 UTC
oracle's user-defined objects
I've been reading the iBatis's mailing lists about using Oracle's user
defined objects as out parameters for a stored procedure. Issue IBATIS-145
covers the issue I'm having. I'm able to use the test code to get my code
working, but I need to modify the iBatis source to do so. I have to make
the method setType for JdbcTypeRegistry public.
The issue is marked as fixed, but the current iBatis release does not have
the JdbcTypeRegistry change. Should I be registering the object type a
different way from the test case or does this need to be re-opened as a new
issue?
Thanks,
Joe George
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/oracle%27s-user-defined-objects-tp14954113p14954113.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: oracle's user-defined objects
Posted by georgj14 <ge...@nationwide.com>.
Yes, I've checked the source. I get an error when I try to use FishEye to
view JdbcTypeRegistry. Using the Subversion link, JdbcTypeRegistry shows
the method setType as private.
Joe
Larry Meadors-2 wrote:
>
> Have you tried to build iBATIS from the source?
>
> It's probably there, but just not released yet - we're hoping to
> release another version soon...
>
> Larry
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 10:36 AM, georgj14 <ge...@nationwide.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been reading the iBatis's mailing lists about using Oracle's user
>> defined objects as out parameters for a stored procedure. Issue
>> IBATIS-145
>> covers the issue I'm having. I'm able to use the test code to get my
>> code
>> working, but I need to modify the iBatis source to do so. I have to make
>> the method setType for JdbcTypeRegistry public.
>>
>> The issue is marked as fixed, but the current iBatis release does not
>> have
>> the JdbcTypeRegistry change. Should I be registering the object type a
>> different way from the test case or does this need to be re-opened as a
>> new
>> issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe George
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/oracle%27s-user-defined-objects-tp14954113p14954113.html
>> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/oracle%27s-user-defined-objects-tp14954113p15018894.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: oracle's user-defined objects
Posted by Larry Meadors <lm...@apache.org>.
Have you tried to build iBATIS from the source?
It's probably there, but just not released yet - we're hoping to
release another version soon...
Larry
On Jan 18, 2008 10:36 AM, georgj14 <ge...@nationwide.com> wrote:
>
> I've been reading the iBatis's mailing lists about using Oracle's user
> defined objects as out parameters for a stored procedure. Issue IBATIS-145
> covers the issue I'm having. I'm able to use the test code to get my code
> working, but I need to modify the iBatis source to do so. I have to make
> the method setType for JdbcTypeRegistry public.
>
> The issue is marked as fixed, but the current iBatis release does not have
> the JdbcTypeRegistry change. Should I be registering the object type a
> different way from the test case or does this need to be re-opened as a new
> issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe George
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/oracle%27s-user-defined-objects-tp14954113p14954113.html
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>