You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/01 23:48:21 UTC
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.1.0-incubating
What's the status of this? :)
I'm watching this to learn the process of how this stuff is supposed to go,
so pardon my denseness, but I'm guessing that we are waiting on Jordan to
send a message to the general list to make sure that nobody has any
objections. As long as nobody has any objections, then we move forward
with actually really releasing an artifact.
Is that correct?
--Eric
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The pre-vote to release Curator 2.1.0-incubating had the following votes:
>
> +1 (binding):
>
> Patrick Hunt
> Luciano Resende
>
> +1 (non binding):
>
> Jordan Zimmerman
> Eric Tschetter
>
> I will move the vote to the @general list.
>
> -Jordan
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Right. First there's a min 72hrs vote on the dev@ list to let the
community decide if it's ready to go (PPMC votes are binding). Once
that is agreed to, and a min of 72 hrs pass, then a new vote thread is
started on general@incubator.apache.org. Once 3+ IPMC members have
signed off (total, votes during the initial dev@ vote by IPMC members
(typically mentors) count towards this total) and another min 72 hrs
pass the release is approved. See those two links for more details on
the mechanics.
Patrick
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, so the "@general" is an apache list, not one of the Curator lists. Got
> it.
>
> Cool.
>
> --Eric
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Jordan started the vote thread on general@ 5 days ago. He's gotten the
>> necessary +1's from the IPMC (at least 3 binding votes), and the 72hr
>> waiting period is over. So at this point he just needs to send the
>> result tally, stage the release artifacts, announce email, update web
>> pages, etc...
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-votes
>>
>> fyi there's now a snazzy page to track rcs/voting, here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > What's the status of this? :)
>> >
>> > I'm watching this to learn the process of how this stuff is supposed to
>> go,
>> > so pardon my denseness, but I'm guessing that we are waiting on Jordan to
>> > send a message to the general list to make sure that nobody has any
>> > objections. As long as nobody has any objections, then we move forward
>> > with actually really releasing an artifact.
>> >
>> > Is that correct?
>> >
>> > --Eric
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> The pre-vote to release Curator 2.1.0-incubating had the following
>> votes:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding):
>> >>
>> >> Patrick Hunt
>> >> Luciano Resende
>> >>
>> >> +1 (non binding):
>> >>
>> >> Jordan Zimmerman
>> >> Eric Tschetter
>> >>
>> >> I will move the vote to the @general list.
>> >>
>> >> -Jordan
>> >>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
Yes, that is part of the process for an Apache incubator project. Once a
project leaves incubation, then it's only the votes on the curator lists
that need to be completed satisfactorily for a release to commence.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, so the "@general" is an apache list, not one of the Curator lists. Got
> it.
>
> Cool.
>
> --Eric
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Jordan started the vote thread on general@ 5 days ago. He's gotten the
> > necessary +1's from the IPMC (at least 3 binding votes), and the 72hr
> > waiting period is over. So at this point he just needs to send the
> > result tally, stage the release artifacts, announce email, update web
> > pages, etc...
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-votes
> >
> > fyi there's now a snazzy page to track rcs/voting, here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > What's the status of this? :)
> > >
> > > I'm watching this to learn the process of how this stuff is supposed to
> > go,
> > > so pardon my denseness, but I'm guessing that we are waiting on Jordan
> to
> > > send a message to the general list to make sure that nobody has any
> > > objections. As long as nobody has any objections, then we move forward
> > > with actually really releasing an artifact.
> > >
> > > Is that correct?
> > >
> > > --Eric
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> The pre-vote to release Curator 2.1.0-incubating had the following
> > votes:
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding):
> > >>
> > >> Patrick Hunt
> > >> Luciano Resende
> > >>
> > >> +1 (non binding):
> > >>
> > >> Jordan Zimmerman
> > >> Eric Tschetter
> > >>
> > >> I will move the vote to the @general list.
> > >>
> > >> -Jordan
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>.
Oh, so the "@general" is an apache list, not one of the Curator lists. Got
it.
Cool.
--Eric
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Jordan started the vote thread on general@ 5 days ago. He's gotten the
> necessary +1's from the IPMC (at least 3 binding votes), and the 72hr
> waiting period is over. So at this point he just needs to send the
> result tally, stage the release artifacts, announce email, update web
> pages, etc...
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-votes
>
> fyi there's now a snazzy page to track rcs/voting, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What's the status of this? :)
> >
> > I'm watching this to learn the process of how this stuff is supposed to
> go,
> > so pardon my denseness, but I'm guessing that we are waiting on Jordan to
> > send a message to the general list to make sure that nobody has any
> > objections. As long as nobody has any objections, then we move forward
> > with actually really releasing an artifact.
> >
> > Is that correct?
> >
> > --Eric
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> The pre-vote to release Curator 2.1.0-incubating had the following
> votes:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding):
> >>
> >> Patrick Hunt
> >> Luciano Resende
> >>
> >> +1 (non binding):
> >>
> >> Jordan Zimmerman
> >> Eric Tschetter
> >>
> >> I will move the vote to the @general list.
> >>
> >> -Jordan
> >>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Jordan started the vote thread on general@ 5 days ago. He's gotten the
necessary +1's from the IPMC (at least 3 binding votes), and the 72hr
waiting period is over. So at this point he just needs to send the
result tally, stage the release artifacts, announce email, update web
pages, etc...
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-votes
fyi there's now a snazzy page to track rcs/voting, here:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
Patrick
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the status of this? :)
>
> I'm watching this to learn the process of how this stuff is supposed to go,
> so pardon my denseness, but I'm guessing that we are waiting on Jordan to
> send a message to the general list to make sure that nobody has any
> objections. As long as nobody has any objections, then we move forward
> with actually really releasing an artifact.
>
> Is that correct?
>
> --Eric
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The pre-vote to release Curator 2.1.0-incubating had the following votes:
>>
>> +1 (binding):
>>
>> Patrick Hunt
>> Luciano Resende
>>
>> +1 (non binding):
>>
>> Jordan Zimmerman
>> Eric Tschetter
>>
>> I will move the vote to the @general list.
>>
>> -Jordan
>>