You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> on 2009/07/15 20:55:06 UTC
branches/2.1 update
All,
I started thinking about updating branches/2.1 to use the new 6.0.20
Tomcat that we're building.
This would include updating genesis version, and probably a few
additional changes. I'd like to keep changes to a minimum. However,
think it would be good to use the new Tomcat generation technique.
Anybody have problems with this?
--kevan
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Adding a apache-snapshot as plugin repository could resolve this
> problem.
>
> <pluginRepositories>
> <pluginRepository>
> <id>apache-snapshots</id>
> <name>Apache Snapshots Repository</name>
> <url>http://repository.apache.org/snapshots</url>
> <layout>default</layout>
> <snapshots>
> <enabled>true</enabled>
> <updatePolicy>daily</updatePolicy>
> <checksumPolicy>ignore</checksumPolicy>
> </snapshots>
> <releases>
> <enabled>false</enabled>
> </releases>
> </pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
Thanks for the pointer, Shawn. Works for me.
--kevan
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
Adding a apache-snapshot as plugin repository could resolve this problem.
<pluginRepositories>
<pluginRepository>
<id>apache-snapshots</id>
<name>Apache Snapshots Repository</name>
<url>http://repository.apache.org/snapshots</url>
<layout>default</layout>
<snapshots>
<enabled>true</enabled>
<updatePolicy>daily</updatePolicy>
<checksumPolicy>ignore</checksumPolicy>
</snapshots>
<releases>
<enabled>false</enabled>
</releases>
</pluginRepository>
</pluginRepositories>
I think It should be a defect of MAVEN. But anyway, we should add the plugin
repository to workaround this problem for now.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> I ran into build problems like the automated 2.1 build, as I didn't build
>> the new Tomcat artifacts locally and the snapshot resolution seems to be
>> broken due to using unique timestamps for the deployed artifacts....
>>
>
> K. Sigh. I'll have a look, but not likely to be until this afternoon... If
> anybody wants to have a look, feel free. Until then, building
> geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-6.0.20/ should avoid the problem...
>
> --kevan
>
>
--
Shawn
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I ran into build problems like the automated 2.1 build, as I didn't
> build the new Tomcat artifacts locally and the snapshot resolution
> seems to be broken due to using unique timestamps for the deployed
> artifacts....
K. Sigh. I'll have a look, but not likely to be until this
afternoon... If anybody wants to have a look, feel free. Until then,
building geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-6.0.20/ should avoid
the problem...
--kevan
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
I ran into build problems like the automated 2.1 build, as I didn't
build the new Tomcat artifacts locally and the snapshot resolution seems
to be broken due to using unique timestamps for the deployed artifacts....
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
> OK. Changes are committed. See GERONIMO-4751.
>
> All JUnit tests and testsuites were passing for me. Would be great for
> other people to try it out.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>
>> +1 for the Tomcat upgrade and a 2.1.5 release.
>>
>> -Jack
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>> +1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains
>> several security fixes.
>>
>> 0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a
>> server release with it....
>>
>>
>> Ya. I was thinking that we might want it for new Nexus repository
>> setup. I might not have been thinking too clearly...
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
OK. Changes are committed. See GERONIMO-4751.
All JUnit tests and testsuites were passing for me. Would be great for
other people to try it out.
--kevan
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> +1 for the Tomcat upgrade and a 2.1.5 release.
>
> -Jack
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Kevan Miller
> <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> +1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several
> security fixes.
>
> 0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server
> release with it....
>
> Ya. I was thinking that we might want it for new Nexus repository
> setup. I might not have been thinking too clearly...
>
> --kevan
>
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the Tomcat upgrade and a 2.1.5 release.
-Jack
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> +1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several security
>> fixes.
>>
>> 0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server release
>> with it....
>>
>
> Ya. I was thinking that we might want it for new Nexus repository setup. I
> might not have been thinking too clearly...
>
> --kevan
>
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> +1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several
> security fixes.
>
> 0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server
> release with it....
Ya. I was thinking that we might want it for new Nexus repository
setup. I might not have been thinking too clearly...
--kevan
Re: branches/2.1 update
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several
security fixes.
0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server
release with it....
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
> All,
> I started thinking about updating branches/2.1 to use the new 6.0.20
> Tomcat that we're building.
>
> This would include updating genesis version, and probably a few
> additional changes. I'd like to keep changes to a minimum. However,
> think it would be good to use the new Tomcat generation technique.
>
> Anybody have problems with this?
>
> --kevan
>