You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> on 2009/09/08 12:22:59 UTC
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build
binding-gdata-runtime
I don't know the GData binidng. However it is working for me which
would suggest that there is either an environment or timing issue when
it gets down to deleting whatever resources have been created.
Simon
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash<na...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> Could you guys please try to increase the SLEEP_INTERVAL from 400L to
>>> 2000L in the Constants class [1] inside the gdata-runtime module and
>>> let us know if this make any changes on the failures.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.1/modules/binding-gdata-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/gdata/Constants.java
>>>
>> I tried this but the test still failed. I then increased it to
>> 3000L and the tests passed but took much longer to run, with
>> frequent lengthy pauses.
>>
>
> It them seems that the problem is the turnaround time on the Google
> Infrastructure to process the post and make the new entry available.
> I'm not sure what to do here, maybe we could increase the delay to
> 3000L only on the more time consuming test, or the worst case disable
> some of them...
>
> Thoughts ?
>
>
Is there any way for the client to get back an acknowledgement from
the Google infrastructure that the new entry is available, so that
it can continue safely when it gets this acknowledgement? The current
API seems to return an Entry object that may or may not be safe to
use at the time it is returned.
Simon
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build
binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash<na...@apache.org> wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Could you guys please try to increase the SLEEP_INTERVAL from 400L to
>> 2000L in the Constants class [1] inside the gdata-runtime module and
>> let us know if this make any changes on the failures.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.1/modules/binding-gdata-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/gdata/Constants.java
>>
> I tried this but the test still failed. I then increased it to
> 3000L and the tests passed but took much longer to run, with
> frequent lengthy pauses.
>
It them seems that the problem is the turnaround time on the Google
Infrastructure to process the post and make the new entry available.
I'm not sure what to do here, maybe we could increase the delay to
3000L only on the more time consuming test, or the worst case disable
some of them...
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build
binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Mine failed at 2000 also. Haven't tried a larger number yet.
Simon
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Simon Laws<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I've just now seen it on Linux. Don't remember seeing it on WinXP.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
> Could you guys please try to increase the SLEEP_INTERVAL from 400L to
> 2000L in the Constants class [1] inside the gdata-runtime module and
> let us know if this make any changes on the failures.
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.1/modules/binding-gdata-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/gdata/Constants.java
>
I tried this but the test still failed. I then increased it to
3000L and the tests passed but took much longer to run, with
frequent lengthy pauses.
Simon
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build
binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Simon Laws<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've just now seen it on Linux. Don't remember seeing it on WinXP.
>
> Simon
>
Could you guys please try to increase the SLEEP_INTERVAL from 400L to
2000L in the Constants class [1] inside the gdata-runtime module and
let us know if this make any changes on the failures.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.1/modules/binding-gdata-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/gdata/Constants.java
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build
binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
I've just now seen it on Linux. Don't remember seeing it on WinXP.
Simon
Re: [jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-3164) Unable to build binding-gdata-runtime
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Simon Laws wrote:
> I don't know the GData binidng. However it is working for me which
> would suggest that there is either an environment or timing issue when
> it gets down to deleting whatever resources have been created.
>
> Simon
>
>
It always (or nearly always) fails for me. Maybe this is Windows/Linux
related.
Simon