You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Toni Menzel <to...@okidokiteam.com> on 2011/03/31 10:27:56 UTC

Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

Hi,

I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff in Felix, so is it true
that 3.2 is the followup of 3.0.9 ? I understand 3.2 is the first release
with the new resolver/diagnostics karma ?


-- 
*Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*

Re: Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.

Yes, it is. As always, we might do a 3.0.10++ if need be (probably
only if there is a request for the backport of a critical bug) but
otherwise, we now switch to 3.2.x.

regards,

Karl

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Toni Menzel <to...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff in Felix, so is it true
> that 3.2 is the followup of 3.0.9 ? I understand 3.2 is the first release
> with the new resolver/diagnostics karma ?
>
>
> --
> *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
>

-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com

Re: Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.

3.0.9 had the new error messages. 3.2.0 includes changes to the resolver that may introduce different but correct behavior, thus the version bump.


Toni Menzel <to...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:

Hi, I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff in Felix, so is it true that 3.2 is the followup of 3.0.9 ? I understand 3.2 is the first release with the new resolver/diagnostics karma ? -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*