You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com> on 2011/05/16 13:48:43 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1103391 - /subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:45, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> ivan@apache.org wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:24:46 -0000:
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>> New Revision: 1103391
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103391&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>> (): Add notes to discuss.
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1103391&r1=1103390&r2=1103391&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>> @@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ Potential items for discussion:
>> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7
>> * What's the plan for 1.8?
>> * Key signing
>> + * ra_serf issues
>> + - Should we leave serf as default http library?
>
> Some issues here...
>
> serf is Apache licensed, neon is LGPL licensed, ASF projects must not
> require non-AL-compatible defaults for non-optional features.
Could you please provide a link for such requirements? Also we can
consider http protocol isn't 'non-optional feature'
--
Ivan Zhakov
Re: svn commit: r1103391 -
/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:48:43 +0200:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:45, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > serf is Apache licensed, neon is LGPL licensed, ASF projects must not
> > require non-AL-compatible defaults for non-optional features.
> Could you please provide a link for such requirements?
Have a look at the license categorization and dependencies discussion at
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved
Re: svn commit: r1103391 -
/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:17:50 +0200:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 14:49, Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> >> We can.
> >>
> >> HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion
> >> client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose
> >> a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon,
> >> which we no longer do).
> >
> Cool, so we don't have legal objections for making neon default
> library in svn 1.7.
*nod*
Re: svn commit: r1103391 - /subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 14:49, Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>> We can.
>>
>> HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion
>> client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose
>> a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon,
>> which we no longer do).
>
Cool, so we don't have legal objections for making neon default
library in svn 1.7.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Re: svn commit: r1103391 - /subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> We can.
>
> HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion
> client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose
> a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon,
> which we no longer do).
+1. -- justin
Re: svn commit: r1103391 - /subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:45, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> ivan@apache.org wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:24:46 -0000:
>>> Author: ivan
>>> Date: Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>>> New Revision: 1103391
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103391&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> * notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>> (): Add notes to discuss.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>>
>>> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1103391&r1=1103390&r2=1103391&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original)
>>> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>>> @@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ Potential items for discussion:
>>> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7
>>> * What's the plan for 1.8?
>>> * Key signing
>>> + * ra_serf issues
>>> + - Should we leave serf as default http library?
>>
>> Some issues here...
>>
>> serf is Apache licensed, neon is LGPL licensed, ASF projects must not
>> require non-AL-compatible defaults for non-optional features.
> Could you please provide a link for such requirements? Also we can
> consider http protocol isn't 'non-optional feature'
We can.
HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion
client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose
a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon,
which we no longer do).
-Hyrum