You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by magellings <ma...@qg.com> on 2009/02/18 23:17:59 UTC
Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1? I
see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22089569.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 15:53 -0700, magellings wrote:
> Hello. I didn't get a response on the question below when attempting to
> follow-up. But I did see that the latest commit to Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ
> states deploying 1.1. Does this mean 1.1 is available?
>
> jgomes 01 April 2009, 13:19:40 -0500 (6 days ago) Make Review Deploy
> Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.1.0
>
There is not an official release of 1.1 yet, the binaries in SVN are not
official releases, they are just builds of current SVN. There isn't a
planned release date as of yet. When the major issues that exist
currently are resolved an new release will be made available. Not
time-frame on that yet.
Regards
Tim.
>
> magellings wrote:
> >
> > Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1? I
> > see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
> >
>
--
Tim Bish
http://fusesource.com
http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Posted by magellings <ma...@qg.com>.
Hello. I didn't get a response on the question below when attempting to
follow-up. But I did see that the latest commit to Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ
states deploying 1.1. Does this mean 1.1 is available?
jgomes 01 April 2009, 13:19:40 -0500 (6 days ago) Make Review Deploy
Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 1.1.0
magellings wrote:
>
> Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1? I
> see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22939958.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Posted by magellings <ma...@qg.com>.
Hello. Just following up on this. It looks like there are still quite a few
items on the backlog for version 1.1. Has any progress been made? Looking
to hopefully utilize the 1.1 version with the failover protocol
implementation in production by end of May 2009.
semog wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't have an estimate yet, but I want to get it completed soon. I have
> several of my own projects that are going into wide-spread production, and
> it would be good to have it stabilized. I'm working on getting some of
> the
> outstanding issues whittled down in order to make this happen. Some
> issues
> may be bumped to 1.2, but those will be decided on a case-by-case basis.
> The major features of 1.1 have been put into place and are currently being
> used/tested/verified by various people. Feel free to report back any of
> your experiences, both positive and negative.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, magellings <ma...@qg.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1?
>> I
>> see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22089569.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22834999.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Posted by magellings <ma...@qg.com>.
Thanks for the update. I work at Quad/Graphics in sussex, wi and we're
currently evaluating activemq with the NMS ActiveMq provider as a
replacement for all of our background job queue services.
Are main interest right now is the failover protocol implementation in
version 1.1. Provided our evaluation goes good, we'll be using activemq and
the NMS provider for all of our background processes here at Quad. most
likely a jdbc master/slave setup for high availability.
Again thanks for the feedback. we'll be keeping an eye out for the release.
please update your progress on this thread if you can.
semog wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't have an estimate yet, but I want to get it completed soon. I have
> several of my own projects that are going into wide-spread production, and
> it would be good to have it stabilized. I'm working on getting some of
> the
> outstanding issues whittled down in order to make this happen. Some
> issues
> may be bumped to 1.2, but those will be decided on a case-by-case basis.
> The major features of 1.1 have been put into place and are currently being
> used/tested/verified by various people. Feel free to report back any of
> your experiences, both positive and negative.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, magellings <ma...@qg.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1?
>> I
>> see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22089569.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22121624.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Estimated release date for ActiveMQ NMS 1.1
Posted by Jim Gomes <e....@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I don't have an estimate yet, but I want to get it completed soon. I have
several of my own projects that are going into wide-spread production, and
it would be good to have it stabilized. I'm working on getting some of the
outstanding issues whittled down in order to make this happen. Some issues
may be bumped to 1.2, but those will be decided on a case-by-case basis.
The major features of 1.1 have been put into place and are currently being
used/tested/verified by various people. Feel free to report back any of
your experiences, both positive and negative.
Thanks,
Jim
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, magellings <ma...@qg.com> wrote:
>
> Could anyone tell me if there is an estimated release date for NMS 1.1? I
> see there are only a few more open issues in the JIRA.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Estimated-release-date-for-ActiveMQ-NMS-1.1-tp22089569p22089569.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>