You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> on 2007/05/04 18:28:56 UTC
EmptyPanel?
In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing with
WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm... i
want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought I'd
mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Jonathan Locke:
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
+1
I have one in every project.
It is particularly useful for a reusable modal dialog that is
defined in the page, and replaced/shown in various forms.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
its a bit redundent api but because of the naming i guess its is fine to
have.
johan
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which
> is
> >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> >> with
> >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think
> "hmm...
> >> i
> >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't
> logged
> >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I
> thought
> >> I'd
> >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
On 5/19/07, Sean Sullivan <se...@seansullivan.com> wrote:
> What was the result of this vote? Is EmptyPanel going to be added to Wicket
> 1.3?
Just added.
Eelco
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Sean Sullivan <se...@seansullivan.com>.
What was the result of this vote? Is EmptyPanel going to be added to Wicket
1.3?
On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
>
>
>
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Xavier Hanin <xa...@gmail.com>.
+1
This is something I add to figure out how to do myself with a
WebMarkupContainer, would have been easier with what you're proposing.
Xavier
On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Eelco
>
> On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> >
> >
> > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> > >> with
> > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
> > >> i
> > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
> > >> I'd
> > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> > >> --
> > >> View this message in context:
> > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
--
Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
+1
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> >> with
> >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
> >> i
> >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
> >> I'd
> >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Xavier Hanin <xa...@gmail.com>.
On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're right about that. EmptyPanel is better, and it should probably be final.
Yes, I think EmptyPanel has the merit of being more obvious in its
intent, and less error prone.
Xavier
>
> Eelco
>
> On 5/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > will that really make things better? if you misname the markup file you will
> > now get component not found rather then markup not found.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
> > > would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
> > > Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1, another class I can remove from our project :)
> > > >
> > > > On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > > > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the
> > > archives
> > > > > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still
> > > think
> > > > > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > > > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eelco
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel
> > > which is
> > > > > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same
> > > thing
> > > > > >> with
> > > > > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a
> > > nice
> > > > > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think
> > > "hmm...
> > > > > >> i
> > > > > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't
> > > logged
> > > > > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I
> > > thought
> > > > > >> I'd
> > > > > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to
> > > core.
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> View this message in context:
> > > > > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > > > > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > > > http://wicketframework.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > > http://wicketframework.org
> > >
> >
>
--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
You're right about that. EmptyPanel is better, and it should probably be final.
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> will that really make things better? if you misname the markup file you will
> now get component not found rather then markup not found.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
> > would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
> > Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1, another class I can remove from our project :)
> > >
> > > On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the
> > archives
> > > > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still
> > think
> > > > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eelco
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel
> > which is
> > > > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same
> > thing
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a
> > nice
> > > > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think
> > "hmm...
> > > > >> i
> > > > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't
> > logged
> > > > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I
> > thought
> > > > >> I'd
> > > > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to
> > core.
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> View this message in context:
> > > > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > > > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > > http://wicketframework.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
will that really make things better? if you misname the markup file you will
now get component not found rather then markup not found.
-igor
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
> would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
> Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1, another class I can remove from our project :)
> >
> > On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the
> archives
> > > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still
> think
> > > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel
> which is
> > > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same
> thing
> > > >> with
> > > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a
> nice
> > > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think
> "hmm...
> > > >> i
> > > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't
> logged
> > > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I
> thought
> > > >> I'd
> > > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to
> core.
> > > >> --
> > > >> View this message in context:
> > > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
That's actually not a bad idea. Xavier, you think you would have found
that/ is it as obvious?
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
> would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
> Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1, another class I can remove from our project :)
> >
> > On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> > > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> > > >> with
> > > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> > > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
> > > >> i
> > > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> > > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
> > > >> I'd
> > > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> > > >> --
> > > >> View this message in context:
> > > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
Martijn
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, another class I can remove from our project :)
>
> On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
> >
> >
> > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> > >> with
> > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
> > >> i
> > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
> > >> I'd
> > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> > >> --
> > >> View this message in context:
> > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1, another class I can remove from our project :)
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
> >> with
> >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
> >> i
> >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
> >> I'd
> >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
VOTE: EmptyPanel
Posted by Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com>.
so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
> it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
> an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
>> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing
>> with
>> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
>> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm...
>> i
>> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
>> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought
>> I'd
>> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: EmptyPanel?
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
+1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think
it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has
an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class.
Eelco
On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is
> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing with
> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice
> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm... i
> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged
> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought I'd
> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>