Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 2nd attempt - CANCELED

[Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>]

Canceled again due to the source license problems.

Rick

On 6/8/2010 4:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looking good... Almost. :-(
>
> The LICENSE files in the binary assemblies are missing the "ADDITIONAL SOURCE LICENSES". I'm guessing that I didn't notice this, last time... IMO, that's a must fix.
>
> There are still a few WARN startup messages. That's minor.
>
> I didn't see any other issues.
>
> Here's my -1
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>    
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE and NOTICE problems have been corrected, the README and Release notes are now correctly included in the binary assemblies, the mini-server version build and version number problems have been corrected, the xbean springframework warnings at startup are suppressed, and a general pruning of subprojects that do not build currently has been performed.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>      
>
>