You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/01 23:24:42 UTC
Re: Is M10 release possible?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>> to Maven.
>
>
> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
> middle of this week .
>
> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
> best choice at this time.
>
> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
> could be the very last Woden release.
>
> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>
> I would like see others thoughts.
I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
if we try simplifying the release process.
> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
> time.
I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
such as the one I use for Axiom.
> Thanks !
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>> >
>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>> > already
>> > incorporated fixes?
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Dmitry
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sagara Gunathunga
>
> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK. That regression is now fixed.
>
> @Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights
> for the WODEN project.
>
Granted, can you please check ?
Thanks !
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
> >
> > http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
> >
> > Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
> > <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
> >> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
> >>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <
> andreas.veithen@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
> >>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
> >>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from
> Forrest
> >>>>> to Maven.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had
> to on
> >>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
> >>>> middle of this week .
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be
> better
> >>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings
> is the
> >>>> best choice at this time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code
> with JDK
> >>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether
> this
> >>>> could be the very last Woden release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this
> approach
> >>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like see others thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
> >>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
> >>> if we try simplifying the release process.
> >>>
> >>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation
> from
> >>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find
> enough
> >>>> time.
> >>>
> >>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
> >>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
> >>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
> >>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
> >>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
> >>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
> >>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
> >>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
> >>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
> >>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
> >>
> >> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
> >> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
> >> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
> >>
> >>>> Thanks !
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andreas
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
> >>>>> > Hello,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
> >>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
> >>>>> > already
> >>>>> > incorporated fixes?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Kind regards,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Dmitry
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sagara Gunathunga
> >>>>
> >>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> >>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> >>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
OK. That regression is now fixed.
@Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights
for the WODEN project.
Andreas
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
>
> http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
>
> Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
>>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>>>> to Maven.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>>>> middle of this week .
>>>>
>>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>>>> best choice at this time.
>>>>
>>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>>>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>>>
>>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>>>
>>>> I would like see others thoughts.
>>>
>>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
>>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
>>> if we try simplifying the release process.
>>>
>>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
>>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
>>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
>>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
>>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
>>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
>>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
>>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
>>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
>>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
>>
>> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
>> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
>> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>>>> > already
>>>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Dmitry
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>>
>>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
Andreas
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
>> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>>> to Maven.
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>>> middle of this week .
>>>
>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>>> best choice at this time.
>>>
>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>>
>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>>
>>> I would like see others thoughts.
>>
>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
>> if we try simplifying the release process.
>>
>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>>> time.
>>
>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
>
> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>
>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>>> > already
>>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>>> >
>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Dmitry
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>
>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is M10 release possible?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
> <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest
>>> to Maven.
>>
>>
>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on
>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
>> middle of this week .
>>
>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better
>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the
>> best choice at this time.
>>
>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK
>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this
>> could be the very last Woden release.
>>
>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach
>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
>>
>> I would like see others thoughts.
>
> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
> if we try simplifying the release process.
>
>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from
>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough
>> time.
>
> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
> such as the one I use for Axiom.
That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
>> Thanks !
>>>
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <re...@list.ru> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
>>> >
>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
>>> > already
>>> > incorporated fixes?
>>> >
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> >
>>> > Dmitry
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>
>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org