You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@camel.apache.org by da...@apache.org on 2009/11/23 14:48:56 UTC
svn commit: r883341 -
/camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java
Author: davsclaus
Date: Mon Nov 23 13:48:55 2009
New Revision: 883341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883341&view=rev
Log:
Fixed compiler issue on HP-UX
Modified:
camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java
Modified: camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java?rev=883341&r1=883340&r2=883341&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java (original)
+++ camel/trunk/components/camel-spring/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/spring/CamelContextFactoryBean.java Mon Nov 23 13:48:55 2009
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
}
// do special preparation for some concepts such as interceptors and policies
- // this is needed as JAXB does not build excaclty the same model definition as Spring DSL would do
+ // this is needed as JAXB does not build exactly the same model definition as Spring DSL would do
// using route builders. So we have here a little custom code to fix the JAXB gaps
for (RouteDefinition route : routes) {
// interceptors should be first
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
}
private void initParent(RouteDefinition route) {
- for (ProcessorDefinition<?> output : route.getOutputs()) {
+ for (ProcessorDefinition output : route.getOutputs()) {
output.setParent(route);
if (output.getOutputs() != null) {
// recursive the outputs
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@
}
}
- private void initParent(ProcessorDefinition<?> parent) {
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+ private void initParent(ProcessorDefinition parent) {
List<ProcessorDefinition> children = parent.getOutputs();
for (ProcessorDefinition child : children) {
child.setParent(parent);
@@ -343,7 +344,7 @@
}
private void initToAsync(RouteDefinition route) {
- List<ProcessorDefinition<?>> outputs = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition<?>>();
+ List<ProcessorDefinition> outputs = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition>();
ToDefinition toAsync = null;
for (ProcessorDefinition output : route.getOutputs()) {
@@ -370,8 +371,8 @@
}
private void initOnExceptions(RouteDefinition route) {
- List<ProcessorDefinition<?>> outputs = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition<?>>();
- List<ProcessorDefinition<?>> exceptionHandlers = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition<?>>();
+ List<ProcessorDefinition> outputs = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition>();
+ List<ProcessorDefinition> exceptionHandlers = new ArrayList<ProcessorDefinition>();
// add global on exceptions if any
if (onExceptions != null && !onExceptions.isEmpty()) {
@@ -404,7 +405,7 @@
// configure intercept
for (InterceptDefinition intercept : getIntercepts()) {
intercept.afterPropertiesSet();
- // add as first output so intercept is handled before the acutal route and that gives
+ // add as first output so intercept is handled before the actual route and that gives
// us the needed head start to init and be able to intercept all the remaining processing steps
route.getOutputs().add(0, intercept);
}
@@ -426,7 +427,7 @@
if (match) {
intercept.afterPropertiesSet();
- // add as first output so intercept is handled before the acutal route and that gives
+ // add as first output so intercept is handled before the actual route and that gives
// us the needed head start to init and be able to intercept all the remaining processing steps
route.getOutputs().add(0, intercept);
}
@@ -435,7 +436,7 @@
// configure intercept send to endpoint
for (InterceptSendToEndpointDefinition intercept : getInterceptSendToEndpoints()) {
intercept.afterPropertiesSet();
- // add as first output so intercept is handled before the acutal route and that gives
+ // add as first output so intercept is handled before the actual route and that gives
// us the needed head start to init and be able to intercept all the remaining processing steps
route.getOutputs().add(0, intercept);
}
@@ -443,7 +444,7 @@
}
private void initOnCompletions(RouteDefinition route) {
- // only add global onCompletion if there are no route alredy
+ // only add global onCompletion if there are no route already
boolean hasRouteScope = false;
for (ProcessorDefinition out : route.getOutputs()) {
if (out instanceof OnCompletionDefinition) {
@@ -478,7 +479,7 @@
TransactedDefinition transacted = null;
// add to correct type
- for (ProcessorDefinition<?> type : types) {
+ for (ProcessorDefinition type : types) {
if (type instanceof PolicyDefinition) {
policy = (PolicyDefinition) type;
} else if (type instanceof TransactedDefinition) {