You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to alexandria-dev@jakarta.apache.org by di...@multitask.com.au on 2003/01/05 12:00:44 UTC
Performance of gen.bat
Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
run.
On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
way until finished.
As an example between
- ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
and
- ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
is around 13 seconds.
Is this to be expected?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours
> or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat
> 7.1 here..
If by complete build you mean gen+update+build all, that's not too far
out of range, on my 2Ghz machine, this takes about 4 hours. I wouldn't
be surprised if on my thinkpad it was closer to 6.
Rubix (the 2Ghz machine) is running plain redhat 7.3.
- Sam Ruby
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours
> or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat
> 7.1 here..
If by complete build you mean gen+update+build all, that's not too far
out of range, on my 2Ghz machine, this takes about 4 hours. I wouldn't
be surprised if on my thinkpad it was closer to 6.
Rubix (the 2Ghz machine) is running plain redhat 7.3.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours
or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat
7.1 here..
Mvgr,
Martin
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 05:56, dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Ok,
>
> That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
>
>
> news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 03:25:02 PM:
>
> > dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > > news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
> > >
> > >
> > > Longer than 45 minutes?
> > >
> > yes!
> >
> > >
> > >>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes
> to
> > >>
> > >
> > >>>run.
> > >>>
> > >>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
> > >>
> > > --
> > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> > > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
> > ForwardSourceID:NT0009F7C6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours
or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat
7.1 here..
Mvgr,
Martin
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 05:56, dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Ok,
>
> That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
>
>
> news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 03:25:02 PM:
>
> > dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > > news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
> > >
> > >
> > > Longer than 45 minutes?
> > >
> > yes!
> >
> > >
> > >>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes
> to
> > >>
> > >
> > >>>run.
> > >>>
> > >>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
> > >>
> > > --
> > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> > > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
> > ForwardSourceID:NT0009F7C6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Ok,
That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 03:25:02 PM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> >
> >
> >>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
> >
> >
> > Longer than 45 minutes?
> >
> yes!
>
> >
> >>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >>
> >>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes
to
> >>
> >
> >>>run.
> >>>
> >>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
> >>
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT0009F7C6
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Ok,
That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 03:25:02 PM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> >
> >
> >>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
> >
> >
> > Longer than 45 minutes?
> >
> yes!
>
> >
> >>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >>
> >>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes
to
> >>
> >
> >>>run.
> >>>
> >>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
> >>
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT0009F7C6
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
>
>
>>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
>
>
> Longer than 45 minutes?
>
yes!
>
>>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
>>
>
>>>run.
>>>
>>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>>
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
>
>
>>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
>
>
> Longer than 45 minutes?
>
yes!
>
>>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
>>
>
>>>run.
>>>
>>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>>
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
>
>
>>Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
>
>
> Longer than 45 minutes?
>
yes!
>
>>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
>>
>
>>>run.
>>>
>>>On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>>
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
Longer than 45 minutes?
>
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> > run.
> >
> > On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM:
> Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
Longer than 45 minutes?
>
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> > run.
> >
> > On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>
> During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
> way until finished.
>
> As an example between
> - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> and
> - ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
>
> is around 13 seconds.
>
> Is this to be expected?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
How long does the gen.sh/.bat take on your box?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au> wrote on 05/01/2003 10:34:05
PM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> > run.
> >
> > On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>
> I'm running the ant build on Linux with my exec-scripts change. That all
> takes < 8 minutes on my slow Celeron 667, so there is some issue there.
>
> Conor
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT0009EF4E
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
How long does the gen.sh/.bat take on your box?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au> wrote on 05/01/2003 10:34:05
PM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> > run.
> >
> > On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>
> I'm running the ant build on Linux with my exec-scripts change. That all
> takes < 8 minutes on my slow Celeron 667, so there is some issue there.
>
> Conor
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT0009EF4E
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
I'm running the ant build on Linux with my exec-scripts change. That all
takes < 8 minutes on my slow Celeron 667, so there is some issue there.
Conor
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>
> During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
> way until finished.
>
> As an example between
> - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> and
> - ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
>
> is around 13 seconds.
>
> Is this to be expected?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 08/01/2003 08:38:15 AM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >
> > I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming
that
> > to echo.old for a test run.
>
> What were the results?
No difference.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 08/01/2003 08:38:15 AM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >
> > I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming
that
> > to echo.old for a test run.
>
> What were the results?
No difference.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>
> I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that
> to echo.old for a test run.
What were the results?
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>
> I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that
> to echo.old for a test run.
What were the results?
- Sam Ruby
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 01:30:03 AM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >
> >>>perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> >>
> >>On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
> >
> > 0:00.20elapsed on mine.
> >
> > Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
>
> Weird. Easy enough to test... remove everything but the echos in
> publish.bat and rerun it against ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>
> Echo is supposed to be built into the shell, so I can't imagine why it
> would be slow.
I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that
to echo.old for a test run.
> Is there something unusual about the file system that you are running
on?
Nope.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
news <ne...@main.gmane.org> wrote on 07/01/2003 01:30:03 AM:
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> >
> >>>perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> >>
> >>On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
> >
> > 0:00.20elapsed on mine.
> >
> > Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
>
> Weird. Easy enough to test... remove everything but the echos in
> publish.bat and rerun it against ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>
> Echo is supposed to be built into the shell, so I can't imagine why it
> would be slow.
I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that
to echo.old for a test run.
> Is there something unusual about the file system that you are running
on?
Nope.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>
>>>perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>>
>>On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
>
> 0:00.20elapsed on mine.
>
> Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
Weird. Easy enough to test... remove everything but the echos in
publish.bat and rerun it against ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
Echo is supposed to be built into the shell, so I can't imagine why it
would be slow.
Is there something unusual about the file system that you are running on?
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>
>>>perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>>
>>On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
>
> 0:00.20elapsed on mine.
>
> Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
Weird. Easy enough to test... remove everything but the echos in
publish.bat and rerun it against ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
Echo is supposed to be built into the shell, so I can't imagine why it
would be slow.
Is there something unusual about the file system that you are running on?
- Sam Ruby
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 01:18:44 AM:
[snip]
> On my thinkpad, if I do this:
>
> > cd /D C:\gump\work>timex
> > call publish ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml C:
> \jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
>
> The elapsed time is 0.38 seconds. Furthermore, if I do this:
C:\source\jakarta\gump\work>\cygwin\bin\time publish.bat
..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
C:\jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
0:11.27elapsed. That's a lot more than .38.
>
> > cd /D C:\gump\work
> > puball ..\rubypad.xml
>
> The *entire* step completes in 73.59 seconds.
This one takes the 40 odd minutes.
>
> Looking in the other direction, publish.bat is merely a bunch of echo
> statements, and one call out to perl. Try just running the perl step,
thus:
>
> > perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>
> On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
0:00.20elapsed on mine.
Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org> wrote on 06/01/2003 01:18:44 AM:
[snip]
> On my thinkpad, if I do this:
>
> > cd /D C:\gump\work>timex
> > call publish ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml C:
> \jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
>
> The elapsed time is 0.38 seconds. Furthermore, if I do this:
C:\source\jakarta\gump\work>\cygwin\bin\time publish.bat
..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
C:\jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
0:11.27elapsed. That's a lot more than .38.
>
> > cd /D C:\gump\work
> > puball ..\rubypad.xml
>
> The *entire* step completes in 73.59 seconds.
This one takes the 40 odd minutes.
>
> Looking in the other direction, publish.bat is merely a bunch of echo
> statements, and one call out to perl. Try just running the perl step,
thus:
>
> > perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
>
> On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
0:00.20elapsed on mine.
Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
P3 1133MHz, 1G RAM
http://www5.pc.ibm.com/us/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_26479ku
> During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
> way until finished.
>
> As an example between
> - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> and
> - ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
>
> is around 13 seconds.
On my thinkpad, if I do this:
> cd /D C:\gump\work>timex
> call publish ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml C:\jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
The elapsed time is 0.38 seconds. Furthermore, if I do this:
> cd /D C:\gump\work
> puball ..\rubypad.xml
The *entire* step completes in 73.59 seconds.
Looking in the other direction, publish.bat is merely a bunch of echo
statements, and one call out to perl. Try just running the perl step, thus:
> perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
- Sam Ruby
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
P3 1133MHz, 1G RAM
http://www5.pc.ibm.com/us/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_26479ku
> During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
> way until finished.
>
> As an example between
> - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> and
> - ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
>
> is around 13 seconds.
On my thinkpad, if I do this:
> cd /D C:\gump\work>timex
> call publish ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml C:\jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html
The elapsed time is 0.38 seconds. Furthermore, if I do this:
> cd /D C:\gump\work
> puball ..\rubypad.xml
The *entire* step completes in 73.59 seconds.
Looking in the other direction, publish.bat is merely a bunch of echo
statements, and one call out to perl. Try just running the perl step, thus:
> perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
I'm running the ant build on Linux with my exec-scripts change. That all
takes < 8 minutes on my slow Celeron 667, so there is some issue there.
Conor
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Performance of gen.bat
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams!
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to
> run.
>
> On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes.
>
> During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that
> way until finished.
>
> As an example between
> - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml
> and
> - ..\project\jakarta-bcel.xml
>
> is around 13 seconds.
>
> Is this to be expected?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>