You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com> on 2007/10/31 14:27:14 UTC

RE: XmlSchemaElement qname not set for qualified element + form not set right

This thread concerns the construct:

@XmlElement(namespace = "some_other_namespace")
int intValue;

Yesterday, Dan Kulp offered the idea (I thought) that this was the way
to get a schema like:

<xsd:element form='qualified' ref='son:intValue' .../>

Sadly for me at the moment, I note that the form property of the element
is 'none', and so is the form property of the referenced element. 

I can code the javascript generator to force qualification in this case,
but is this correct? 

One possibility is that jaxb is just not interested in form= on
elements, and only does qualification when it notices a schema
disparity. This leads to interesting questions about what happens when
you construct a WSDL/XSD that uses form='qualified' 'gratuitously', in
terms of what annotations result.
 

RE: XmlSchemaElement qname not set for qualified element + form not set right

Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
To answer part of my own question:

The result is 

@XmlElement(namespace = "")

The result of this, indeed, is to force an explicit prefix for the
current schema TNS.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bim2007@basistech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:27 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Daniel Kulp
> Subject: RE: XmlSchemaElement qname not set for qualified element +
form
> not set right
> 
> This thread concerns the construct:
> 
> @XmlElement(namespace = "some_other_namespace")
> int intValue;
> 
> Yesterday, Dan Kulp offered the idea (I thought) that this was the way
> to get a schema like:
> 
> <xsd:element form='qualified' ref='son:intValue' .../>
> 
> Sadly for me at the moment, I note that the form property of the
element
> is 'none', and so is the form property of the referenced element.
> 
> I can code the javascript generator to force qualification in this
case,
> but is this correct?
> 
> One possibility is that jaxb is just not interested in form= on
> elements, and only does qualification when it notices a schema
> disparity. This leads to interesting questions about what happens when
> you construct a WSDL/XSD that uses form='qualified' 'gratuitously', in
> terms of what annotations result.
>